> From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 13 05:50 MET 2001
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:32:53 -0500
> From: Tod Matola <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [POLL] URI for DCES, DCQ and DCT
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hello.
>
> Rachel Heery wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Matola,Tod wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > After further discussion with Eric and Stu, I wanted to repost the relevant
> > > parts Eric's proposal for how to apply the current namespace convention to
> > > the other two recommended documents (DCQ and DCT).
> > >
> > > Please keep in mind that there are 2 questions:
> > >
> > > 1) how do we associate a URI with a word (and)
> > > 2) what to we get when we resolve the URI?
> >
> > I have a feeling that using PURLs in this situation actually adds
> > complexity.... is there a reason not to use dublincore.org??
> >
> > If we use PURLS does it mean the second question could be split into
> >
> > 2a what URL do we get when we resolve the PURL
>
What might be relevant to some humans and/or machines: What content they get ....
Or are just just talking about whether a string looks (!) nice...?
rs
|