Tom Slater wrote:
> I believe that there are vast amounts of examples to which subscribers
> to this group could direct your attention to show that your posting is
> both invalid and, I think, bordering on offensive.
I suspect many list subscribers share Tom Slater's reaction (and even more the
reaction of James DeFilippis).
If it is invalid, and if I have completely failed to take account of the
reality of critical geography, then I am completely in error. My criticisms
are entirely mistaken, my views are entirely wrong. Considering that no-one
else makes similar attacks on crititical geography, then the conclusion must
be, that there is nothing substantially wrong with it.
Well then, that is simply the end of the matter, is it not?
--
Paul Treanor
|