Isaac
What patients with what pathology do you see? Then look at the CSP/other
reseach databases and see how your 'intended interventions' may impact
upon the outcome of the problem - SHOULD be easy after that.
Seriously, though, there are pros and cons to all of them and I notice
you haven't mentioned neuropathodynamics and Travell (trigger points).
Also if you're considering acupuncture, take a look at dry needling.
Dave r
PS forgot about hyperbaric oxygen therapy and ..............n
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neumann Isaac Rutger, Granheim
> [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 26 January 2001 10:27
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: SV: Craniosacral Therapy
>
>
>
> You've got a point there, John. But I leave the scientific proof over
> to Mel
> and Barrett. I just have one question to all the private practice PT's
> on
> the list...: if you had to make a list of the post-graduate education
> that
> you think is worth the money, what of the following would you do
> (besides
> manual therapy): McConnell (just the knee?), McKenzie, Mulligan,
> acupuncture. I actually wanna do 'em all, but I have to make choices.
>
> Isaac
>
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: John Willenbruch [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sendt: 26. januar 2001 11:06
> Til: [log in to unmask]
> Emne: Re: Craniosacral Therapy
>
>
> Talking of "rattling the scientific cage",
>
> All the talk of a search for scientific data as regards CS therapy got
> me
> thinking is there that much more scientific evidence for the use of
> the
> following:
>
> Maitland
> VMO training
> McKenzie
> Mulligan
> Manips
> Laser
> etc etc
>
> As physios discussing alternative medicine it seems to me it is a bit
> like
> the pot calling the kettle black.
>
> Sorry to probably insult the entire population of this mailbase but
> what the
> heck your only all my future employers and colleagues!!!!
>
> Cheers
> John Willenbruch MCSP
>
> P.S. I am fully prepared and in fact happy to be shot down in flames
> on
> this issue.
> ><< I think we make a good couple, Barrett,... like ying and yang. You
> try
> >to
> >cool me down, I try to lighten you up. ;-) >>
> >
> >***Deep down, I think that you may be underestimating Barrett, so
> that the
> >above situation may have been vice versa, all along. The prey may
> really
> >be
> >the hunter and the watcher may be the watched.
> >
> ><I will tell you little secret. I have sort of a nasty habit to
> provoke
> >people into discussions like this, hehehe. Can't help it. I just like
> to
> >rattle the scientific cage.>
> >
> >***As long as what escapes from its cage enriches the science and
> practice
> >of
> >what this group represents, may that cage continue to be rattled.
> However,
> >it would still be of value to see some scientific or clinical
> assessment of
> >craniosacral work - in other words, to see some substance behind the
> >rattling. You cannot wriggle so easily out of that cage of your own
> making
> >-
> >let's see what's in the cage now :) No rattling, no provocation, no
> >laughter, just some hard, cool, unsmiling science. Now, about
> craniosacral
> >.........
> >
> >Dr Mel C Siff
> >Denver, USA
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ___
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com.
|