JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-MAPS Archives


LIS-MAPS Archives

LIS-MAPS Archives


lis-maps@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-MAPS Home

LIS-MAPS Home

LIS-MAPS  January 2001

LIS-MAPS January 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Edina Digimap

From:

David Medyckyj-Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

lis-maps - a forum for issues related to map & spatial data librarianship <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:36:25 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (137 lines)

Dear All,

There are obviously a variety of issues regarding EDINA Digimap coming up 
on these mail lists which I will deal with in this and subsequent e-mails.

Dealing with Kathryn's comments first...


>A few thoughts:
>One disadvantage with Edina Digimap data is that there is no historical
>mapping. If we stop buying paper maps and rely on Digimap we will only have
>access to this year's mapping not any previous years. So there will be no
>historical collection growing over time. The only solution is to buy the
>data directly from OS, much more expensive than paper maps.

EDINA is aware of this issue and has been looking into it for some time.

1) The Digimap.Plus Project (the R&D wing of Digimap) is working on a pilot 
service to
provide access to historic OS large-scale maps i.e. Ordnance Survey 1:10 
560/1:10 000 scale and 1:2500 scale County Series and superseded National 
Grid mapping supplied through the Landmark Information Group Ltd. This 
pilot service, which comprises data for Edinburgh and Newcastle, should be 
available to six trial University sites in early February - later than we 
wanted but trying to build a seamless database of this data has been 
technologically challenging (we have been using MrSID and are not so 
enamoured with it as some of the other contributors to this list). If the 
trial proves successful i.e. demand is shown to exist for this data, EDINA 
will be talking to JISC about the possibility of a national service. We 
would hope that such a service would provide access to maps for the period 
1843-1945+.

Before anyone responds by pointing out the existence of 
http://www.old-maps.co.uk/ (and online access to 1:10560 scale maps) let me 
say that it is our intention that the final service would allow you to view 
maps from all the different periods (epochs)and scales, side by side and 
alongside current OS data.

2) You may perhaps have noted that OS do not provide access to earlier 
versions of their digital map data. (Try calling them and asking for copies 
of Land-Line data for 1996.) It is in fact a technically difficult thing to 
do requiring huge amounts of disk space. The OS DNF provides a way forward 
for large-scale mapping because it will allow the identification of change 
between time periods and one can then potentially keep a historic record of 
an object  - at the moment all one knows is that a particular Land-Line 
tile has changed even though only a few objects within that map tile may 
have changed.

We are currently drafting a proposal to submit to the JISC for funding to 
look at the implications of DNF for Digimap (significant). Part of the 
proposal is entitled 'Change over time' and will look at how we could 
modify the service to make use of the improvements in the DNF so that, for 
example, a student working in a project in 2004 could make a map of part 
of, say, Oxford as it was in 2001. At the same time we will look at 
providing users with the ability to download earlier versions of the NTF 
and DXF data. Whether EDINA should become a on-line 'archive' for OS 
digital map data is something that is not clear at the moment - it would 
certainly have financial implications for the JISC and remember that EDINA 
is only funded by the JISC to provide access to OS data until 2004.


>Digimap Carto needs to get online before we can assess how useful Digimap is
>really going to be for the average student with no specialist GIS knowledge
>but who just 'wants a map'.

Digimap Carto is not aimed at the average student. For the student who just 
wants a map, we recommend they use the basic mapping tool. Digimap Carto is 
aimed at the more advanced user, by offering them increased functionality; 
someone who, for example, understands the concept of scale. We welcome 
suggestions on how the basic mapping tool might be improved. The next 
version will include a place name search facility, similar to Get-a-map. In 
the future we would hope to add postcode searching as well.


>Postcode maps would be very useful. UK Borders 'sort of' does this but not
>really, unless things have changed since I last looked.

UKBORDERS was first released in 1995. Development funding from the ESRC was 
frontloaded and EDINA have been therefore hampered in developing a web 
mapping capability. We are currently seeking funding to add such a 
capability. One possibility is for UKBORDERS to be linked to Digimap. Users 
would then be able to overlay postcode areas on top of Land-Line maps. 
Would that be something people would be interested in us doing?

>Any chance of BGS data!?

Good idea!


>With more Universities joining up, can we negotiate for more than 33% of the
>UK? I bet a lot less than 33% is chosen because we want to hold some tiles
>in reserve for unexpected major projects. Alternatively, could we have a
>swapping system for tiles and deselect ones we have finished with and choose
>alternatives for new projects?

I think we all agree that the 30% limit is a major handicap and is 
hampering both the uptake of the service and service development. We are 
also aware that it is an administrative headache for subscribing sites and, 
to be honest, we would prefer spending our time improving the service 
instead of managing the tile selection process. (For those not aware of the 
issue, JISC had insufficient funds available to secure access to all 
229,000 of the Land-Line.PlusŪ tiles, therefore the agreement between 
Ordnance Survey and JISC specifies that no more than 30% of the 
Land-Line.PlusŪ tiles may be available for digital mapping or data download 
in any given academic year.) It is interesting to note however that during 
the first academic year of the service, a total of 62,100 Land-Line tiles 
were selected, and of these only 28,353 were used within the service. On 
every possible occasion EDINA raises the issue with OS and JISC. We can 
only hope that the meeting between OS and JISC in the spring produces 
something.


David Medyckyj-Scott








*********************************************************************
   Dr David Medyckyj-Scott
   EDINA Service Manager,
   Research and Geo-data Services Team

   Data Library
   Edinburgh University
   Main Library Building
   George Square
   Edinburgh EH8 9LJ, Scotland

   tel: +44 (0) 131 651 1308            fax: +44 (0) 131 650 3308
   Email: [log in to unmask]
   URL: http://edina.ac.uk/
*********************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager