JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Archives


WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Archives

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Archives


WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Home

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT Home

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT  2001

WEB-ASSISTED-ASSESSMENT 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: XML, resource discovery and MCQ sharing

From:

jon sims williams <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

This list, hosted by the CASTLE project, is for those interested in conduct" <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:37:53 -0500

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (50 lines)

David,

Unfortunately when it comes to setting MCQs panels of
experts dont know how difficult a question is. The only way
to find out is to try the questions on students. Worse than
that the same question is not equally difficult for
students on appently not very different courses. To give
you an example there is a factor of 1.5 between the times
given for the same question to different groups of students
studying essentially the same material.

> Implicit in what you said is that you don't need a panel of experts to judge
> the difficulty of questions in an exam set. In fact you were a little
> provocative to suggest they wouldn't know. Presumably someone knows how
> suitable a question is, otherwise it wouldn't be used?
>
> Surely someone's had to ratify the questions before they got into your exam
> set? OF COURSE BUT IT DOESNT MEAN THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE
DOING.

 Or does anyone just chuck 'em in and wait for the analysis after the
> exam to check how good they were? Does your external examiner have any say?
>
> Without wanting to labour the point, if someone, even an single individual,
> perhaps the module coordinator, decides what questions go into an exam, this
> is made no more or less of a test if there are 50 discreet questions or 50
> stems with hundreds of interchangeable branches. In fact I'd argue that the
> task was made just a little bit easier if the computer can assist in the
> compilation of questions.
I AGREE BUT THE SET OF QUESTIONS THAT EACH STUDENT GETS ARE
NOT EQUIVALENT - FORTUNATELY THEY DONT COMPLAIN AND NOONE
REALLY  KNOWS WHICH IS EASIER AND WHICH MORE DIFFICULT
WITHOUT COLLECTING DATA ON EACH SEPARATE COMBINATION. WE
COLLECT DATA ON ALL OUR QUESTIONS AND ARE BUILDING A TOOL
WHICH WILL ALLOW THE TEACHER OF EACH UNIT THAT USES EACH
QUESTION TO HAVE THEIR OWN SET OF MEASURES FOR THE
QUESTIONS DIFFICULTY AND TIME-TO-DO.

STUDENTS STILL COMPLAIN THAT OUR TESTS ARE NOT EQUALLY
DIFFICULT BUT HOPEFULLY IT WILL GET BETTER WHENT HE TOOL IS
AVAILABLE.

----------------------
Jon Sims Williams
Dept. Engineering Maths,
University of Bristol
Bristol BS8 1TR
Email: [log in to unmask]
Tel; 0117-928 7757, Fax: 0117-925 1154

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

February 2024
October 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
October 2022
June 2022
April 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
March 2021
February 2021
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
April 2019
March 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
June 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager