JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

SPM  2001

SPM 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: covary with emotion scale

From:

Daniel Weissman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Daniel Weissman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 30 May 2001 14:51:36 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (107 lines)

Dear Maria,

    If I understand your question correctly, then you need to first perform
10 t-contrasts (one for each subject) that measure how much the thalamus is
activated in condition 1 relative to condition 2.  In the context of a fixed
effects analysis, you would perform a t-contrast by placing, for example, a
1 in the contrast manager every time condition 1 occurs, a -1 in the
contrast manager every time condition 2 occurs, and zeroes elsewhere.  Note
that in a fixed effects analysis, all runs from all subjects are lumped
together.  Therefore, the 1s and -1s are averaged across all runs and all
subjects.

    It sounds as if you want to correlate the extent of thalamic activity in
condition 1 relative to condition 2 with a behavioral measure of emotion on
a subject-by-subject basis.  To do this, you need to perform 2 steps.
First, compute N t-contrasts, one for each subject.  As in the fixed effects
analysis, each contrast should contrast activity in condition 1 with that in
condition 2.  However, each contrast should be performed using the data from
just one of the N subjects in your design.  Let's assume that you have 10
subjects in your design, that each one was tested in 10 runs, and that
you've entered the 100 runs in the order that they were collected into your
fixed effects model.  In that case, the first 10 runs belong to subject 1,
the second 10 runs belong to subject 2, etc.  To compute a t-contrast for
subject 1, enter 1s and -1s for conditions 1 and 2 in the first 10 runs and
zeroes for all other subjects.  A similar procedure can be used compute
t-contrasts for the other subjects.  Unless you have specific hypotheses
about temporal or dispersion differences between your trial types, you'll
likely want to enter the 1s and -1s for the Betas that represent the
amplitude of the BOLD response for conditions 1 and 2.  Each time you
perform a t-contrast, both an SPM_T*.img file and a con*.img file will be
produced.  Therefore, at the end of this procedure, you should have N
SPM_T*img files and N con*.img files, assuming that you have N subjects.

    After all the t-contrasts are made, you can select Basic Models on the
SPM GUI.  You'll then see an option for 'Simple Regression (Correlation).'
Select this choice and you will be prompted to select some images to enter
into the correlation.  If you want to correlate the t-values with the
behavioral measure, select the N spm_T***.img files.  If you want to
correlate the difference in Beta weights for conditions 1 and 2 with the
behavioral measure, select the N con***.img files.  Correlating the t-values
with the behavioral measure will assess the degree to which a reliable
statistical result is associated with your behavioral outcome.  Correlating
the difference in Beta weights for conditions 1 and 2 with the behavioral
measure will reveal the degree to which a difference in the BOLD response
between conditions 1 and 2 is associated with your behavioral outcome.  When
you are finished selecting all N images, hit done and you will be asked
several questions.
Here are some possible answers, which should get you started.

1.  If you've already performed global scaling during the estimation of your
fixed effects model, I believe you should say no when it asks whether you
want grand mean scaling.

2.  I generally say no to threshold masking at this stage.

3.  As for the implicit and explicit masks, these are the same as for other
contrasts so if you don't want any masks just say no.

4.  I think you can omit the global calculation.

5.  Finally, you'll be asked to enter the covariate (i.e., behavioral
measure).  If you entered the images in order of subjects 1 - N, you should
enter 1 behavioral measure per subject in order of subject 1,2, .....up to
subject N.  In your case, this will be the single score from the emotion
scale for subject 1, the single score from subject 2, etc.

6.  Next, you may choose whether to estimate the model now or later.

    Once you have estimated this model, I believe that an SPM.mat file and
associated images will be deposited into the current working directory.  If
you open this file from within the results section, you can make new t
contrasts.  I think that entering a 1 into the contrast manager will show
voxels where greater activity in condition 1 than in condition 2 is
positively correlated with your behavioral measure.  Entering a -1 into the
contrast manager will create a t contrast that reveals negative
correlations.

Hope that's helpful,

:> Daniel
Daniel Weissman, PhD
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
Duke University
Durham, NC 27705
phone: (919)-681-1029
fax: (919)-681-0815
e-mail: [log in to unmask]


----- Original Message -----

> Dear spmers,
>
> I have run a fixed effects fMRI analysis and now that I have certain areas
of
> activation I have been asked to covary, for example the thalamus
activation,
> with the emotion scale results that we have for each subject.  I'm not at
all
> sure how to go about this.
>
> Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
>
> Maria
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager