JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SEA-SITE Archives


SEA-SITE Archives

SEA-SITE Archives


SEA-SITE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SEA-SITE Home

SEA-SITE Home

SEA-SITE  2001

SEA-SITE 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: SEA-SITE Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 (#2001-34)

From:

Jeremy <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Investigating the environment of marine archaeological sites <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:13:37 +0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (80 lines)

On 31/3/01 07:17, "Automatic digest processor" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

Martin Read wrote
>
> Date:    Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:20:21 GMT
> From:    Martin Joseph Read <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: lead shot identification
>
> Greetings
>
> I am looking at some of the concretions from the mid 17thc Salcombe
> wreck. Several concretions have lead shot of diameter 16.4-16.7mm,
> which would have been fired from a gun of ca.17mm diameter.
>
> I am trying to work out what might have fired them. I have been going
> through the list of lead shot references which Paulo Monteiro posted
> (thanks, extremely useful). Richard Larnes' report on the VOC Campen
> identifies larger and smaller shot, but not those around this
> diameter.
>
> Campen, 1627
> 17mm+   Musket
> 16.6mm  ?
> 15.3-15.5 mm    Caliver
>
> Other published wrecks also have similar sizes shot:
>
> Santo Christo de Castello, 1667
> 17mm    Musket
> 16mm    Carbine
> 13mm    Pistol
>
> Dartmouth 1690
> 16mm    Carbine/ Musketoon
>
> The Meresteyn,  1702
> 18mm    Musket
> 16.5mm  Musket
> 16mm    Carbine/Musketoon
>
> I understand that the diameter of muskets got smaller with time, so
> the Meresteyn may be a read herring. What about the possibility of
> them being from a carbine?
>
> Someone has suggested a a fusil or fusee which was a light type
> of musket, something like a carbine. Any thoughts?
>
> Can any of you suggest any further references to research this or
> anybody who might be able to help?
> **********************************************
> Martin Read
> Institute of Marine Studies
> University of Plymouth
> e-mail:[log in to unmask]
> http://hydrography.ims.plym.ac.uk
>
> 'I don't want to achieve immortality through my work
> - I want to achieve it through not dying' - Woody Allen
>
> **********************************************
>
There is a possibility that this is a carbine. The Dutch regulations 1599 to
1639 talk about 18 rolling (round) bullets to the pont which equates to 16.6
mm. See BAR 489 The Retourschip Batavia p71. For more details
---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          ________________
Jeremy Green                                   __?__     |Dude,           |
Dept. Maritime Archaeology                    /     \    |The information |
Western Australian Maritime Museum            |      |   |in this email is|
Cliff Street                                 ^^ (o)(o)   |not confidential|
FREMANTLE                                   (.   ,---   / please feel free|
WA 6160          W. Australia                 | |,___| /  to forward it   |
[log in to unmask]                 |  \__/  \  to who ever you |
(61-8) 94318440                               /_  __\   \ want            |
(61-8) 94318489 (F)**NOTE NEW NUMBER*        /__\/_/ \   \    Doh         |
(61-8) 93358071 (H)                                       \_______________|
(041) 797-9657  (Mobile)
See us on the web at http://www.mm.wa.gov.au

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
December 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
December 2022
September 2022
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
July 2021
May 2021
December 2020
October 2020
September 2020
June 2020
February 2020
March 2019
December 2018
October 2018
July 2018
April 2018
September 2017
July 2017
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
April 2014
February 2014
January 2014
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager