i wonder if the list is to be informed if kent's posts are actually
blocked? i wonder if the list will be given the reasons [chapter and
verse] for such actions if posts are blocked?
i also wonder if kent will be suspended if one of his posts should prove
unacceptable to the listowners? in other words, would kent be blocked
then gagged in order to prevent him commenting on your decision?
if this list is to become a "red zone" then i'd rather know than live
with an illusion of openness.
steve
on Fri, 20 Jul 2001 21:08:13 -0400
Candice Ward <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> At Kent's insistence, I hereby inform the list that, due to concern
>> over his stated intention to post material directly to the list which
>> might pose a risk of copyright-infringement liability for Poetryetc
>> and/or JISCmail, his posts have been flagged for review prior to
>> forwarding to the rest of you. He can still post to the list as
>> usual, but thus far he's elected to use the back channels, which is
>> his prerogative, as is yours to set your filters accordingly.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Candice
o
+ . o
dEbRiS <><
e [log in to unmask] . ><[[[[º>
web http://www.debris.org.uk
scattered_fragMents.l0ose_materiALs.etc o
. / . . ||| . / .*-|/-* delete?
|||||||||1|||||||||2|||||||||3|||||||||4|||||||||5|||||||||6||||||||7||
exit
|