On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Chris Hamilton-Emery wrote...
>Contributions are copyright the author. But Salt will have exclusive licence
>to serve the material on its website.
If I'm reading this right, it would mean that if I posted something on
this topic, although I'd have copyright, I wouldn't be allowed to
reproduce the material on my own website, if I wanted to. I'm not sure
I'm happy with that.
You wouldn't care to change that to "non-exclusive licence" would you?
What is the advantage of requiring exclusivity?
Regards,
--
Peter
http://www.hphoward.demon.co.uk/poetry/
|