Dear Wystan
It got to me that this guy is calling this topic (in his words)"really dumb". I
shouldn't take it personally, but I have already given three years to this project,
and there'll be more to come; in fact, if I succeed, I'll probably stick to it
forever. I find it very sad that he thinks the Jung/Campbell take on the hero myth
is only interesting " to those who get off on the fact that We're All the Same (for
Wagner the We was Germans) except for those pesky Jews". Why would he inject anti-
semetism into this? This is ugly AND incorrect. It won't take too much to work out
that the hero myth is/has always been present in many different culture (Jewish
included) and it is found interesting by a lot of people amongst them Hollywood
producers, prose-writers, organisers of the Olympics ceremony, poets like me, and
the billions of people who go to the movies, read novels and watch sports.
As for advantages of the epic in this day and age, well, just reading Heaney's
translation of Beowolf, amongst other contemporary texts, provides an answer. You
can compare this with his other works, and see how the form and this hero-myth has
expanded and flourished this poet's already wide horizons. But let's see what the
group comes up with. I'm sure we'll have a hefty list in a few months time.
Anyhow, as for the original 'cons' of this topic, I think, I can comfortably
conclude that some people are simply scared of the 'e' word; they think it's too
long, too formal and they see it as ideologically flawed. I'm surprised the charge
of sexism hasn't come up yet; it was the first one at a uni seminar last year. I
also like what David said about epics dwelling on stereotypes and predictable
endings.
You see, I'd like to think that the epic can be reinvented. It's crazy and loopy and
I should be writing a thesis about Derrida or something else instead, (my choice of
topic has already harmed my career a few times) but that's all irrelevant to the
fact that without the epic there wouldn't be literature as we know it. To me it's
that simple.
Ali
Dear Ali,
wasn't my impression Mark had it in for you, he has it in for epics.
Indeed, his objections represent one way of fleshing out my own. You are
happier with David's response, yet his pluses feed as readily into Mark's
negatives as his minuses.
maybe it would help to move this thread along if you said what it is about
the genre that seems most useful, attractive at this juncture?
Or have you already made this clear and I've forgotten?
Wystan
-----Original Message-----
From: ALI ALIZADEH [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2001 2:07 p.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The epic: pros and cons
Dear Mark
I wish you had stayed at the bottom of your canyon. I really do. But then
again you
crack me up. Why didn't you stay there? Go on, go back...
I promised myself after a week at the bottom of a canyon that I wouldn't
enter into any really dumb topics,
Like I said, some people deserve more time alone than others; that means
YOU.
Mark, what do you have against me? I've felt your hostility from the minute
I joined
the chat group. As it is, I am quite familiar with the rites of passage, and
I have
been mentionining it in previous posts. As for Wagner and Nitzche, it's YOUR
assumption that Jung got his ideas from them, not anyone else's, including
Jung
himself. In his autobiography Jung cites Goethe as a significant figure when
it came
to developing the archetypes. His relationship with Nitzche was rather
fleeting.
Not in itself very nteresting except to those (like the above-mentioned) who
get off
on the fact that We're All the Same (for Wagner the We was Germans) except
for
those pesky Jews.
I'm trying not to take any of this personally. The hero myth has inspired
fascism as
much as it's isnpired socialism, capitalism, femenism, religion and any
other human
phenomenon. Like everything else it's been used, abused, etc. Take the myth
of Joan
of Arc in France; she was depicted as a hero by both the Vichy government
and the
Resistance during WWII. As for accusing ME of anti-semetism, I'm finding it
funny.
I have to say, you're way off the line.
So not a very good defining trait for a genre. It happens that the epic as
understood in the West was conceived...
the epic was concieved in the East a long time before your Greek
heritage-makers.
And that's the tradition that I grew up with. Frankly, I care very little
for
the 'origins' of the form because they are absolutely unattainable. I'm more
interested in its various manifestations.
What relevance does this sort of project have to the world as most of us
know it? Why would any sane human being want to do this now?
It obviously has no relevance to you, and I hate to break the news here; but
you,
Mark are NOT the world. I know you may think you are, but...And I didn't
claim to
be 'sane' either. And please stop trying to get a reaction out of me by
offending
me. It won't work. Now, if you have a serious question about my project,
feel free
to ask properly.
Cheers
Ali
|