>Wow, i did mean what i said. if you take it to be childish then ok.
Daniel.
>
Daniel,
you should not be too worried about this. If you have been childish , here,
and if you have indeed behaved naively, as you have done, and if you are
really 23 years old, you probably are condemned to childlessness for quite
a long period of time to come. Are you not. It is a cronology of the being.
A mind develops and matures...given a certain standart level of
intelligence and potentials...at a slower pace nowadays.. (I myself am
still 11 and quite proud to eb such!)
You have often expressed ideas and thoughts that, however sharp or learned,
are imbued with an excesses ....which is not bad , in principle...
yet...they have lacked in measure and balance and tactics...which, to be
honest, are all features needed...features of the dialoguing practise you
will get to learn , the more you will meet sitiations of this kind:
collectiveness.
the political attacks you have made, (or let say, the several criticisms)
to JK are of course legitimate ones, but they have been over-passionate .
in fact, in diplomacy, in parliament, things are posed in a different way...
Anarchism it is a political doctrine as good as the others on the market
(and in the view of someone, it is a doctrine better than other
ones...aren't we all legitimate to express judgements and opinions?)
There is no point to argue against anarchism in the way you did. This is a
post-idelogical society, matter of fact, and this is a fully postmodern
reality, I am sure you are aware of it....
So, all these contentiousness is pointless. Anarchism is not only a
political doctrine, it is a philosophy, a way of conceiving life....it is a
vision of the world and it is a perpective...as good as yours (fino a prova
contraria).
You accepted somehow that your behavious was childish. I am content. Fair
enough. I feel that to be childish in general it is ok, expecially because
you are young objectively (lucky you), as a leaf, therefore green, we
presume (unless you rottened at a too early stage), and expecially because
you are talking poetry (it would be less ok if you were to be a minister or
a diplomat dealing with international affairs). It is ok for you to play
Little Red Ridinghopod, here, among us, the poets, the odd ones,
the "reitetti della societa'".
|