here we need you to please make the effort to quote
from the sourse. It is not enough to post
bibliographical datas to the task of dialoguing. It
serves no purpose. And also the tone you are using to
oppose what I say as an Italian voter in relation to
the winning election of " Berlusca", seems to grant
absolute reason of judgement to this ? X-unknown
article. I do not have handy the issue you are
quoting, say New York Review of Books, June 21, 2001
(Vol. XLVIII, no. 10). Please, giev us a glimpse then
as why did Sir Berlusconi the Great won his election.
Was it maybe because that half of the population is
nostalgic of Fascism? Or are they as they are aspitant
Capitalists?
He will fall , Sir Berlusconi's government, fear not.
erminia
(I would be glad to know who am I talking to, " Fight
your mind". I am fighting mine, are you fighting
yours?"
--- fight for your mind <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> here's the bit that is missed:
>
> New York Review of Books, June 21, 2001 (Vol.
> XLVIII, no. 10)
>
> - arguing that it wasn't really media and money, by
> itself, that made
> Berlusconi's throning possible
>
>
> > Nevertheless, these Italian were
> > convinced that they won their election campaign
> for
> > the strength of their convictions: the reality is
> that
> > Berlusconi was elected because in fact Berlusconi
> he
> > invested all the money that he had earned with his
> > shares in "multi-nazionali" in the Electoral
> campaign
> > and in the treacherous exploitation of his Medias
> (TV
> > radio newspapers magazines). That was a majestic
> > brain-washing who left the brainless voters so
> > content!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
|