That's weird, Matthew, I just tested and the link works from my original
post but not from the copy on your reply. Yet both are identical. Puzzled.
Best
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Francis" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: Steiner
> Sadly, the link didn't work. Ah well...
>
> Best wishes
>
> M
> -----Original Message-----
> From: david.bircumshaw <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 27 July 2001 23:55
> Subject: Re: Steiner
>
>
> >Ah well here's a pressie for you Matthew, deserved indeed for those
> >beautiful, tantalising poems in your Feature, if you go to the possibly
> best
> >Lem site on the Web:
> >
> >http://www.rpi.edu/~sofkam/lem/#fables
> >
> >you will find among the links on a long page the fable entire. With, I
> >understand, the author's permission.
> >
> >And yeah, Gigamesh was brilliant, amazed Patrick didn't do a sequel, the
> one
> >that really gets me from 'A Perfect Vacuum', the heart-rending finale to
> >'Personoids' apart, is the outrageously funny and , too, deadly serious
> >'Gruppenfuhrer Louis the XVI'. What a fillum that could make.
> >
> >Best
> >
> >Dave
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Martin J. Walker" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:03 PM
> >Subject: Re: Steiner
> >
> >
> >> I wish I could check that Lem story out, David, but it's not in my
> >> collection. As you mention Lem, though: without him we would certainly
be
> >> ill-informed about *the*
> >> post-joycean-etymo-musico-coprophili-polylogogryphical "novel" of the
> last
> >> century, Patrick Hannahan's _Gigamesh_.
> >> Martin
> >>
> >
>
|