>If someone out there isn't falling for Kent's sudden, but predictable,
>about-face into civility and truth-telling,
The above suggests your problem in a nut-shell, Hess. You feel I have a
casual and irresponsible attitude to "truth-telling" because of my publicly
contested relationship with a controversial literary work. Apparently, you
believe that this relationship justifies slander and personal/collective
abuse on an email list, including with the aid of fabricated e-mail
addresses.
While you've been acting like a hurting idiot, and while you've continued to
pillory me, I've been waiting for you to make good on the claim of wanting
to talk about these issues, so that I might suggest to you in further detail
that there is a fundamental ontological difference between the two cases I
outline in the preceding paragraph.
You've done poorly, tough guy. Too bad.
Kent
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
|