alison wrote:
>> These actions were taken for reasons obvious to the list and others
>> which will not be. Neither Candice nor I have any intention of
>> entering a torturous and time-wasting discussion on who said what to
>> whom.
i've no idea whether i will be allowed to comment for much longer, or
whether this message will get through.
i say that alison will not explain the actions of the listowners with
regard to the "gagging" and subsequent expulsion of kent johnson because
she _cannot_ explain those actions.
was kent hounded from poetryetc because he threatened the list?
kent himself admits that he tends to "overpost", but that can't be the
problem, surely? as a long-standing list member i'm aware that there are
in fact several people here who tend to "overpost". when will those
people be dealt with?
or was kent hounded from poetryetc [by the same people who silenced him
on british-poets] because certain people don't like his point of view
and think he ought not to be allowed to speak?
steve
on Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:51:36 +1000
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>> Anthony asked:
>>
>> >did Kent unsubscribe or was he removed? I'm not clear on this.
>>
>> Kent was removed at the discretion of the list owners, after his postings
>> were placed under review (which meant that they went to us first before
>> being distributed to the list). Kent was aware he was under review, as a
>> notice goes to any subscriber whose settings are altered in this way.
>> These actions were taken for reasons obvious to the list and others which
>> will not be. Neither Candice nor I have any intention of entering a
>> torturous and time-wasting discussion on who said what to whom.
>>
>> Now, on with the show!
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Alison
o
+ . o
dEbRiS <><
e [log in to unmask] . ><[[[[º>
web http://www.debris.org.uk
scattered_fragMents.l0ose_materiALs.etc o
. / . . ||| . / .*-|/-* delete?
|||||||||1|||||||||2|||||||||3|||||||||4|||||||||5|||||||||6||||||||7||
exit
|