JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2001

PODIATRY 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

from next months ACSM mtg

From:

Craig Payne <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

No title defined <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 12 May 2001 04:57:41 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (37 lines)

DO ANTI-PRONATION SHOES ALTER ANKLE JOINT KINEMATICS AT DIFFERENT RUNNING
VELOCITIES? R.E.Arendse, M.P.Schwellnus, FACSM, D.R.Tabakin, N.G.Langerak,
A.St Clair Gibson, C.L.Vaughan, T.D.Noakes, FACSM. University of Cape Town,
Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa

The purpose of the study was to compare ankle eversion and inversion
(pronation and supination) in barefoot running (BF) to running with minimal
anti-pronation shoes (NS) and maximal anti-pronation shoes (APS), at
different running velocities. Twelve (12) injury free male runners
[27(5)yrs, 73(11)kg, 1.8(0.1)m] with neutral lower limb alignment as
determined by a standard clinical biomechanical assessment, undertook
overground runnng at 2.3, 3.5 and 5.0 m/s in the BF, NS and APS conditions.
Right foot stance kinematic data were captured at 120HZ with a 6 camera
Oxford Metrics Vicon 3D Motion Analysis system. Ankle anatomical joint
angles (degrees) between initial contact and mid-stance
(eversion/pronation), and mid-stance and terminal contact
(inversion/supination) were calculated and are presented in the table
below. There was significantly less ankle eversion and inversion (pronation
and supination) for the BF vs NS and APS at 2.3 and 3.5 m/s [(p<0.05)#].
There was significantly less ankle eversion (pronation) for BF vs APS
[(p<0.05)\ddagger], and less ankle inversion (eversion) for the BF vs NS
[(p<0.05)\diamond] at 5.0m/s. A trend of greater eversion and inversion
(pronation and supination) for the NS vs APS was noted at all running
velocities. In conclusion, sports shoes increased ankle eversion and
inversion (pronation and supination) during running irrespective of the
anti-pronation properties of the shoes or the running velocity.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager