Below I have pasted the contents list of a special supplement of The Annals
of Occupational Hygiene, on assessing pesticide exposure in risk assessment,
which will be published shortly. It is kindly sponsored by TNO, and will go
to all subscribers and BOHS members. The guest editors are Joop van Hemmen
and Katinka van der Jagt. Abstracts of most Annals papers, like those of
many other journals, are available after publication on Medline on
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/
This weekend is the deadline for abstracts for the Inhaled Particles IX
Symposium (Cambridge UK, 3-6 Sept), so sorry if you missed it, but we have
had 119 submissions so it should be a good meeting. For details see
www.bohs.org
Trevor Ogden
Editor-in-Chief, Ann Occ Hyg
Committee Member, IP IX
pp S1-S3
Innovative exposure assessment of pesticide uses for appropriate risk
assessment. Introductory Remarks. J.J. van Hemmen, K.E. van der Jagt
pp S5-S17
Could pesticide toxicology studies be more relevant to occupational risk
assessment? J.H. Ross, J.H. Driver, R.C. Cochran, T. Thongsinthusak, R.I.
Krieger
pp S19-S21
Critique of the paper: could pesticide toxicology studies be more relevant
to occupational risk assessment? (by Ross et al., 2001) N.G. Carmichael
pp S23-S28
Refinement of risk assessment of dermally and intermittently exposed
pesticide workers: A critique B.C. Hakkert
pp S29-S42
Probabilistic exposure assessment of operator and residential non-dietary
exposure C. Lunchick
pp S43-S47
Probabilistic exposure assessment of operator and residential exposure; a
Canadian regulatory perspective M. Mitchell, C. Campbell
pp S49-S54
Challenges of probabilistic assessment of operator and residential
non-dietary exposure S. Hunter Youngren, M.A. Youngren, L. Barraj
pp S55-S64
An example to illustrate the potential use of probabilistic modelling to
estimate operator exposure to pesticides P.Y. Hamey
pp S65-S67
Use of probabilistic methods in exposure assessment in Germany. O.C.L.
Mekel, R. Fehr
pp S69-S79
The need for appropriate use information to refine pesticide user exposure
assessments. P.Y. Hamey
pp S81-S86
Considerations regarding the collection of pesticide use information for
regulatory purposes. J. Marquart
pp S87-S93
Pesticide usage monitoring in the United Kingdom. M.R. Thomas
pp S95-S101
Data on application frequency of pesticide for risk assessment purposes.
H.L. van Drooge, C.N. Groeneveld, H.J. Schipper
pp S103-S105
An Australian experience of using work practices to establish an exposure
model for shearers. V. Villiere
pp S107-S118
Crossing the river stone by stone: approaches for residential risk
assessment for consumers. M.P. Van Veen, J.G.M. Van Engelen, M.T.M. van Raaij
pp S119-S123
New challenges: residential pesticide exposure assessment in the California
Department of Pesticide Regulation, USA. S. Powell
pp S125-S129
Methods to study everyday use of products in households: The Wageningen
Mouthing Study as an Example. L.P.A. Steenbekkers
pp S131-S142
Assessing aggregate and cumulative pesticide risks using a probabilistic
model. P.S. Price, J.S. Young, C.F. Chaisson
pp S143-S153
Biomonitoring of persons exposed to insecticides used in residences. R.I.
Krieger, C.E. Bernard, T.M. Dinoff, J.H. Ross, R.L. Williams
pp S155-S157
Toxicology studies should be relevant for worker risk assessment - Summary of
discussions. C.N. Groeneveld, J.J. van Hemmen
pp S159-S162
Probabilistic exposure assessment is essential for assessing risks - Summary
of Discussions. H.L. van Drooge, A.G. van Haelst
pp S163-S166
Field use information is important for assessing the risk of exposure -
Summary of Discussions. H.J. Schipper
pp S167-S170
Residential exposure should be considered in appropriate terms: Summary of
Discussions. K.E. van der Jagt
pp S171-S174
Risk assessment of worker and residential exposure to pesticides:
Conclusions and Recommendations. J.J. van Hemmen, C.N. Groeneveld, H. van
Drooge, A.G. Van Haelst, A.H.J. Schipper, K.E. van der Jagt
Trevor Ogden
Abingdon, Oxfordshire
[log in to unmask]
|