JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY  2001

FILM-PHILOSOPHY 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

5.23 Wartenberg's Response

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

Film-Philosophy Salon <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:31:10 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

_____________________............._____

    F I L M - P H I L O S O P H Y

    Journal | Salon | Portal
    PO Box 26161, London SW8 4WD
    http://www.film-philosophy.com

    Vol. 5  No. 23, July 2001
_____________________............._____




    Thomas E. Wartenberg

    Film, Philosophy, and the Ordinary
    A Response to Butler



Brian Butler
Transgression: Ordinary and Otherwise
_Film-Philosophy_, vol. 5 no. 22, July 2001
http://www.film-philosophy.com/vol5-2001/n22butler

Reading Brian Butler's review of my book, _Unlikely Couples: Movie Romance
as Social Criticism_, was an extraordinary experience, for the context
within which he placed my book was one of which I had not been fully
conscious. While I am aware that my own work on film had been inspired, in
part, by Stanley Cavell, I had not connected his concern with the
'ordinary' to my discussion of the 'unlikely couple film'. Butler, however,
sees that my question of whether popular narrative film can be a site of
social criticism has clear links with questions of the ordinary, so I'd
like to spend some time thinking through the connection he sees in my book.

As I begin to reflect on the issue of the ordinary in relation to my book,
I find myself returning to the 1990 film _White Palace_ (directed by Luis
Mondoki), the film that initiated my study of the unlikely couple film, and
that I still find to be worthy of further reflection, despite my sense that
the film's ending undercuts its message. One thing that the film proposes
is that many of the hierarchical dichotomies that structure our thought --
upper class/working class; high art/mass art; depth/surface -- will not
bear the weight we put upon them. The film uses the story of its highly
unlikely couple in order to cast a critical glance at how such dichotomies
structure our thinking, our lives, and our society, making the case for
integrating both poles of these dichotomies into all aspects of our world.

In so far as the film makes this case, it makes contact with another film I
discuss, _The Crying Game_ (Neil Jordan, 1992). In my comments on that
film, I argue that it employs a strategy of critique that destabilizes the
central dichotomies that the film initially proposes. As Butler points out,
I argue that this strategy is a more adequate means of critiquing
dichotomies than the simpler ones, such as inverting the valuation of a
dichotomy, that I see present in other films.

It is worth distinguishing this type of film interpretation from one
favored by adherents of cultural studies, with which it might be confused.
My interpretations do not assert that a viewer has the ability to resist
the conformist agenda of a film like, say, _Pretty Woman_ (Garry Marshall,
1990), by developing a reading 'against the grain', one that tendentiously
highlights only those aspects of the film that contribute to an
interpretation that fits in with the ideas of the viewer. (In the book, I
point to Hilary Radner's interesting interpretation of _Pretty Woman_ as an
example of just such a cultural studies approach.) Rather, my
interpretations attempt to lay bare, in what may appear to be a most
ordinary object, a depth that might escape one's notice. In so doing, it
highlights aspects of the films that other readings might leave out, and
demands that they be taken account of. Such a strategy of reading claims to
be more true to the film than those produced within certain branches of
cultural studies.

Here I see myself as following in Kierkegaard's footsteps. How often have
we heard the story of Abraham and Isaac without really stopping to think
about it? Wasn't this just another one of those stories that those of us in
the Judeo-Christian tradition had learned to hear but not be bothered by?
And yet how extraordinary this story is, as Kierkegaard and others have
made us see.

Now this juxtaposition of a Bible story with popular film may seem
outrageous to many readers. But, as Butler points out, one of the goals of
my book is to bring an awareness of the illegitimacy of hierarchical
dichotomies into the study of film itself. And here there is no doubt that
my work follows in the footsteps of Cavell's. In much of his work on film
Cavell has argued that films that we take to be quite ordinary, and think
that we understand, have depths that have still not fully been plumbed. His
gestures of juxtaposing _It Happened One Night_ and _The Critique of Pure
Reason_, or _North by Northwest_ and _Hamlet_, are meant to undermine our
conviction that there is an intellectual gap between high and popular
culture.

There is another aspect to Butler's exegesis of my book that I would like
to discuss: that it demonstrates how cultures provide the materials for
their own critiques through their own contradictions. To make this case
would require going beyond what I argued for in _Unlikely Couples_, where I
was concerned to show the presence of a democratic spirit within this
genre. I am, in fact, in sympathy with the idea that cultures like our own
are not unities ruled by a single idea, but rather complexes with elements
that do not fit together into a unified whole. As a result, critique can
make use of elements within the cultural melange to undermine others. As
Butler points out, this accounts for the ability of popular films to be
socially critical: they need not resort to esoteric ideas in order to
criticize dominant values, but have recourse to equally fundamental aspects
of the culture that stand in conflict with those values. Throughout my
readings I emphasize how our belief in the underlying equality of all human
beings is used by these films to undermine different forms of social
hierarchy that threaten to destroy the possibility of romance. In so doing
the films take up an idea fundamental to our culture: that all people are
created equal. This idea may now seem rather ordinary to us, part of our
stock of cultural ideals; but the fact that it still has significant and
under-appreciated critical purchase is a central burden of my study of the
unlikely couple film.

Mount Holyoke College
South Hadley, Massachusetts, USA


Copyright © _Film-Philosophy_ 2001

Thomas E. Wartenberg, 'Film, Philosophy, and the Ordinary: A Response to
Butler', _Film-Philosophy_, vol. 5 no. 23, July 2001
<http://www.film-philosophy.com/vol5-2001/n23wartenberg>.

    ________....

Salon review articles are there to be discussed and contested and continued
by you members, so please send your thoughts to:

    [log in to unmask]

    ______________....

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager