--- John Foster <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ray makes a good point. This sniping at Greenpeace represents the
> typical
> response of fear indicative of the most polluting and environmentally
> abusive companies in the world. Corporate America does not like
> Greenpeace
> because of the publishing of "No Safe Margin" a scientific account of
> the
> presence of very high amounts of dioxin downstream in fish in the rivers
> where pulp mills discharge effluent. I know the author personally. The
This reminds me of when Greenpeace got into bed with Ben & Jerry's. I
find their claims are lessened by their inability to criticize Ben &
Jerry's for making their ice cream when it has been shown that at least on
one instance it contained rather high levels of dioxin.
The levels were so high that there would be an estimated 200 more cancers
among lifetime consumers of Ben & Jerry's.
Particularly troubling is the fact that Ben & Jerry's is consumed by a
large number of children. Children who might be more susceptible to the
dangers of dioxin.
> all these little ad homimen arguements that Jim (and Steve Verdon) is
You were saying David?
Steve
=====
"In a nutshell, he [Steve] is 100% unadulterated evil. I do not believe in a 'Satan', but this man is as close to 'the real McCoy' as they come."
--Jamey Lee West
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
|