JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE  2001

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[CSL]: Bill aims to block wireless junk email

From:

John Armitage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The Cyber-Society-Live mailing list is a moderated discussion list for those interested <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:21:03 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

Bill aims to block wireless junk email

By Patrick Ross

Staff Writer, CNET News.com

January 10, 2001, 10:40 a.m. PT
URL: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-4432707.html

WASHINGTON--In our wireless world, can solicitors find you anywhere within
cell range if you have a data-ready wireless phone
turned on?

Internet users have for years been complaining about unwanted email, or
spam, with messages that promise everything from quick
cash to an enhanced love life. Consumers now are concerned about spam sent
to their wireless devices such as Internet-ready
phones, and Congress is taking notice.

One of the first bills introduced this Congress would make it a criminal act
to send a solicitation to a wireless device without that
individual's express permission. Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., has been one of the
most vocal opponents of spam and first introduced this
bill at the end of the last Congress last fall. However, the legislation is
questioned both by the wireless industry and anti-spam
crusaders.

"With the wireless industry moving to build spam out" of its infrastructure,
said online privacy consultant Ray Everett-Church, "that is
going to be a lot more effective than a new law."

Holt could not immediately be reached for comment.

Everett-Church, co-founder of the anti-spam organization, Coalition Against
Unsolicited Commercial Email (CAUCE), said Holt has
introduced legislation "before the system has been built to allow this
problem to occur."

In November, the Wireless Ad Association released a list of industry
guidelines that said "The WAA does not condone wireless
targeted advertising or content (push messaging) intentionally or
negligently sent to any subscriber's wireless mobile device without
explicit subscriber permission and clear identification of the sender."

The WAA defined push messaging as including audio, short message service
(SMS), email, multimedia messaging, cell broadcast,
picture messages, surveys, or any other pushed ads or content. The
guidelines advocate customer control of personally identifiable
information, or PII.

This endorsement of "opt-in," meaning a consumer must offer specific consent
before information can be sent to his or her device,
puts the wireless industry much farther down the road to privacy than the
larger Internet, Everett-Church said. He said advertisers
want to make sure people actually read wireless ads and don't dismiss them
the way junk email is dismissed.

WAA chairman Tim DePriest said the industry must be careful as "wireless
advertising has the potential to cause irreparable harm,
expense to the customer, and undermine the value of an important
communication line between customers and advertisers."

Holt and others in Congress have fought for several years to ban traditional
spam, and a bill by Rep. Heather Wilson, R-N.M.,
passed the House overwhelmingly last year after some controversial
provisions were removed. But no significant anti-spam bill has
ever become law, in part due to First Amendment concerns.

CAUCE has argued that it's not a violation of the U.S. Constitution if
spammers are forced to reimburse network providers and
consumers the cost that results from the transmission and receipt of the
unwanted email. It has been difficult, however, for
lawmakers to determine a fair way to calculate those costs.

The online advertising industry has proposed its own set of guidelines for
unsolicited email, but those guidelines aren't as strict as
the ones proposed by wireless advertisers. In addition, the Internet has an
open architecture, which makes it more difficult to control
unwanted messages than in a closed, proprietary wireless network.

That's why Everett-Church, who was a major supporter of the Wilson
legislation against spam last year, is less inclined to back
Holt's wireless spam bill.

"If you plan anti-spam technology into the wireless infrastructure, you have
a much greater chance" of eliminating spam, he said.

************************************************************************************
Distributed through Cyber-Society-Live [CSL]: CSL is a moderated discussion
list made up of people who are interested in the interdisciplinary academic
study of Cyber Society in all its manifestations.To join the list please visit:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/cyber-society-live.html
*************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager