JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE  2001

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[CSL]: Breaking Law or Principles to Give Information to U.S

From:

John Armitage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The Cyber-Society-Live mailing list is a moderated discussion list for those interested <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:52:24 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (136 lines)

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/23/national/23LIBR.html?todaysheadlines================================================
THE NEW YORK TIMES

November 23, 2001

CONFIDENTIALITY

Breaking Law or Principles to Give Information to U.S.

By DAVID E. ROSENBAUM

       WASHINGTON, Nov. 22 - When the names and photographs were first
released, Kathleen Hensman, a public
       librarian in Delray Beach, Fla., recognized some of the suspected
hijackers in the attacks on the World Trade
Center and the Pentagon as men who had used the computers in her small
library.

She immediately called the police.

That broke a Florida law that guarantees confidentiality to library patrons.
It also violated a cardinal principle of librarians never to tell the
police, in absence of a court order, about who uses their rooms and what
books they check out.

But almost no one thinks Ms. Hensman did the wrong thing. Of course, she
will not be prosecuted.

Professionals in many other fields are also re-evaluating long-held precepts
in light of the terrorist attacks and the war that
followed.

Reporters and photographers in Afghanistan, trained to keep at arm's length
from the authorities, have come across
documents left behind by fleeing Al Qaeda operatives. Now they are faced
with the question of whether they turn over
their documents and photos to the military for potential use in trials.

The Federation of American Scientists, whose project on government secrecy
was created 10 years ago to force more
government data into the open, decided after Sept. 11 to remove from its Web
site information about United States
intelligence and nuclear weapons sites.

A pharmacist in Florida, also sworn to maintain confidentiality, reported to
the police that over the summer he had
recommended treatment to one of the suspected hijackers who had badly
chapped hands.

Many lawyers are rethinking their concept of civil liberties in view of the
administration's decision to use military tribunals
to try foreigners accused of terrorism and to monitor communications between
people in federal custody and their lawyers.

Robert M. Steele, an expert in journalism ethics at the Poynter Institute, a
research center in St. Petersburg, Fla.,
expressed the view of people in many professions that the terrorism was so
horrific that ordinary scruples might not apply.

"Principles are always in tension with other principles," Mr. Steele said.
"Seldom is there absolutism."

Steven Aftergood, who founded the scientists' project on government secrecy,
said, "I have had to come to terms with the
fact that government secrecy is not the worst thing in the world. There are
worse things."

Ms. Hensman, the librarian, said she was well aware of the Florida law and
of her professional responsibility, but she has
no qualms about calling the police.

"People were murdered," she said, "and people have a right to know that
terrorists were here in our library using our public
facilities."

After Ms. Hensman called, the police in Delray Beach, between Fort
Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, notified the
F.B.I. Agents obtained a court order and seized two computers the suspects
were thought to have used. Officials said they
hoped to retrieve e-mail messages the hijackers sent and received.

Librarians' assertion of the principle of confidentiality may seem trivial
to some people compared with similar stands by,
say, doctors or priests. But librarians take it very seriously - so
seriously that in most libraries nowadays, once a book is
returned, the record of who checked it out is expunged. Forty-eight states
have laws that protect the privacy of library
patrons.

As a consequence, Ms. Hensman's decision to call the police has been the
topic of considerable debate in professional
library circles, especially in Florida. The assistant library director in
Broward County, Fla., Betty Dejean, circulated a
memorandum reminding librarians that they could not give any information to
authorities who did not have a court order.

In an interview, Ms. Dejean said that she was "not standing in judgment" of
Ms. Hensman but that librarians were
obligated to maintain their principles and follow the law in all
circumstances.

Asked about this, Ms. Hensman said she could not have waited for the police
to get a court order because the police did
not know what she knew and therefore did not know to apply for an order.

Depending on its interpretation, the antiterrorism legislation enacted last
month could make library records more accessible
to federal agents. Thomas M. Susman, a Washington lawyer who often
represents the interests of librarians, said he had
been studying the hastily drawn statute to discern its implications.

"I don't mind relinquishing some rights to catch these people," Mr. Susman
said. "Five thousand deaths in one blow does
that to you."

Mary Wegner, Iowa's chief librarian, said that the notion of a librarian
calling the police gave her pause but that the more
she thought about it, the more she thought Ms. Hensman acted properly.

"I suppose our duty to our fellow humans trumps everything else," Ms. Wegner
said.

Judith Krug, director of the American Library Association's office of
intellectual freedom, said, "I would have felt better if
she had followed the Florida law."

But Ms. Krug added, "I suspect most people faced with the same situation
would have done what she did."

************************************************************************************
Distributed through Cyber-Society-Live [CSL]: CSL is a moderated discussion
list made up of people who are interested in the interdisciplinary academic
study of Cyber Society in all its manifestations.To join the list please visit:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/cyber-society-live.html
*************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager