JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE  2001

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[CSL]: IN THRALL TO THE COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY

From:

John Armitage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The Cyber-Society-Live mailing list is a moderated discussion list for those interested <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 15 May 2001 16:39:27 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (147 lines)

http://www.en.monde-diplomatique.fr/2001/05/14idleness
Le Monde diplomatique, May 2001

IN THRALL TO THE COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY

Slaves of idleness

Internet, cell phones, videophones, virtual reality devices, computers,
modems, data banks: the communications industry is taking over.

Productivity, utility, management are the watchwords.

But are we masters or servants of our devices ?

by LUCIEN SFEZ *

Information highways, despite the hype, are no more than a combination of
telephone, video and computers, as are the gadgets telecom engineers devise
for the future. They are all really just cell phones plugged into the
internet, linking with fixed stations, videophones, virtual reality devices,
computers, modems, data banks, tradesmen, managers, repairmen. All are
logged in to technical, social or professional networks.
There are no black holes, no negatives, no opposites in this joined-up
world. Everything runs smoothly in electronic silence. Even the occasional
audible signal can be turned off. Communication is easy when all it involves
is using machines to connect with machines. If you want to stop
communicating, to enjoy your own company, all you have to do is put down the
handset and switch off the screen.

Anyone using such machines is free and happy in a world of instant
communication, without time to think ill of himself or of anyone else. The
long term doesn't exist in this world, only short-term gains. The
communications industry dreams of productivity, utility and management, the
watchwords of homo communicans.


Homo communicans is inseparable from his communication devices. They are his
life and he takes on their characteristics. He is their servant as much as
their master, but he is unaware of his chains because he believes himself to
be in control and as powerful as the machines. They make his life easy.
Everything is positive, everything in its place. There is no price to pay
and no other side of the coin in what Douglas Coupland, in his novel
Microserfs (1), calls the "flatland of cyberculture". Cyberculture uses the
language of clans and communities but it does not share their reality, for
to join the clan, you have to make sacrifices. And in cyber flatland the
only thing to fear is the loss of the machines: breakdown.

When I asked Martin Landau, an eminent researcher in organisation science at
Berkeley, California, about theories of communication, he replied: "Do you
know why the 747 is the safest aircraft in the world? Because it has four
separate control systems, one for each engine. And the pilot also has a
manual control system separate from those four" (2). It seemed a strange
answer. In aviation, breakdown means death. But breakdown in communication,
loss of relationships or position, is also a kind of death, the end of homo
communicans, who lives by communication and is defined only by the links his
machines give him to other machine-bound human beings. Think how people
panic when their computer or television breaks down or their phone is out of
order. The gap in their lives causes real distress. These machines have
become part of us; we have become part of them. When they break down it is
like being in pain, the fear of it is a nightmare.

That is the system's only contradiction, the only conceivable misfortune.
The fear of breakdown has replaced the old apocalyptic fear of the devil,
and it is only the threat of that breakdown which gives life and feeling to
a system that has none. This is the communication system's last vital
opportunity. In his book Anatomy of Criticism (3), Northrop Frye shows that
the Apocalypse is a text that advocate union between the city, the
individual and God. And just as fear of the Apocalypse exists to serve the
Christian faith, so fear of breakdown exists to consolidate the cult of the
computer.

But homo communicans, ignorant of the sacrifices of communication, does not
know this. He thinks he is always on the winning side, not knowing that in
order to win you also have to lose. He doesn't know what he is losing.

Driving for you

Machines are created for productivity and efficiency, and have unexpected
consequences: they make men into idle and superfluous creatures who no
longer do much on their own initiative. Men are assisted in everything, even
getting to work, since with their self-guided cars they can dream at the
steering wheel until the device tells them they have arrived. The old
hauliers' slogan "driving for you" now applies to us all. As technology
continues to develop, homo communicans faces a future of total, profound
idleness. And the first signs of this are already visible in our daily
lives.

We let machines remember things for us, from our address books complete with
telephone numbers and email addresses to the management of bibliographies,
texts, business meetings, accounts, planning. Our voice, or better still a
synthetic one, answers for us, recorded once for all time. We open doors and
change channels on the TV remotely. We are not far from spending our entire
lives in a semi-dormant state.
Our listlessness is encouraged by the sense of security we derive from all
the surveillance devices that surround us. Idleness goes hand in hand with
freedom from fear, a sense of comfort, of being safe, warm and protected.
With sophisticated devices to watch over us, there are no enemies to worry
about. Voice and face recognition, digital fingerprints and cameras with
access codes free us from fear of intruders.

If they do not need to defend themselves, people's existence begins to seem
pointless. As if they are present by accident and might as well not exist.
Machines do human work to perfection, while people are clumsy and hesitant
and make mistakes, trying falteringly to follow a pattern. The idea of the
human brain as the poor relation of the all-powerful computer has lead to a
sense of powerlessness and futility. Our memories have grown unretentive but
we don't care; the business of remembering is being safely managed.

Contrary to common belief, homo communicans of the future will not suffer
from pressure and stress. Why should he? His mistakes will be corrected by
machines. Society with its faults of inequality, poverty, war and death,
will be corrected by technology. This world where communication is all will
not be fast-moving, but slow, inactive, contemplative, full of play. Not the
slowness advocated by Pierre Sansot (4), the slowness of taking time out to
enjoy life and savour the pleasures of fruit, fresh air and dreams, but an
enforced slowness, reassuring and with no place for expectancy or surprise.

Homo communicans is good at dreams and contemplation, and his dreams will
probably generate new ideas for communicating machines, more invention and
innovation. That may be the real work assigned to human beings in the future
of communication since the rest, engineering and production, will be done by
machines.

Plato warned young philosophers against books, which he likened to dead
memories that replaced living ones on the pretext of being more convenient.
He said that writing and books make for idleness, making the reader passive.
His advice seems archaic (today's educators would give anything to get
people to read). But although the medium has changed, Plato's message has
not. We are still handing our obligations over to an external device. From
Plato's viewpoint, the idleness resulting from freedom from work done by
machines idleness would be evidence of enslavement unworthy of human beings.

* Professor at the University of Paris I - Sorbonne
(1) Douglas Coupland, Microserfs, Flamingo, London, 1996
(2) Critique de la communication, Seuil, Paris, 1988, third edition 1992.
(3) Penguin, London, 1990.
(4) Pierre Sansot, Du bon usage de la lenteur, Payot, Paris, 1998.

Translated by Malcolm Greenwood

************************************************************************************
Distributed through Cyber-Society-Live [CSL]: CSL is a moderated discussion
list made up of people who are interested in the interdisciplinary academic
study of Cyber Society in all its manifestations.To join the list please visit:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/cyber-society-live.html
*************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager