JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE  2001

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[CSL]: U.S. Military: No Room for the Unexpected

From:

John Armitage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The Cyber-Society-Live mailing list is a moderated discussion list for those interested <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 2 May 2001 08:36:21 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

http://www.stratfor.com/US_Canada/commentary/0104301930.htmU.S. Military: No Room for the Unexpected
01 May 2001

By George Friedman

For the past two months, top aides to U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H.
Rumsfeld have been conducting a systematic review of American military
strategy
and force structure. Last week, as the first official leaks began to emerge,
there
were few surprises. Rumsfeld's review reportedly concluded  the United
States
needs to move away from its initial post-Cold War doctrine that U.S. forces
be
sized and prepared to fight two major regional conflicts simultaneously,
such as
fighting a renewed conflict with Iraq and repulsing a North Korean attack
against
South Korea.

As compelling and valuable as these reforms may be, however, Rumsfeld and
his
policy aides may be walking into a self-created trap. The Pentagon
leadership is
moving to examine -- and likely to instigate major structural change to --
the U.S. military, absent a review of overall U.S. national security
strategy that should be the precursor to any changes in the force.

This is not to say the Defense Department and armed services aren't overdue
for a
rooftop-to-basement re-examination of roles, missions, organization and
weapons.
They most certainly are.

For instance, the two-conflict military doctrine -- now a decade old --
created a
requirement for the current U.S. military structure that includes both
mobile and
heavy combat units. Most critics point out that this doctrine required the
fewest
painful changes, allowing each service to trim its size without major cuts
or, worse,asymmetrical sacrifices.

But the force structure generated from the two-war doctrine has had
fundamental
problems, particularly in terms of the span of distance from bases in the
United
States to regions such as Southwest Asia or the Far East. Either they need
to
deploy in the area of anticipated conflict or the U.S. regional commander
suddenly
involved in a conflict must wait for their arrival, which can take months.

Rumsfeld's review, therefore, seems to point to a reasonable conclusion that
the
fundamental structure of U.S. military organization must be reconsidered in
light of the new strategic realities as well as combat implications of new
information
technology.

But it is critical that the new Pentagon leaders not confuse the quantity of
deployments with the strategic significance of those deployments.

Conflicts involving great powers obviously are much more rare than the
perennial
outbreaks of low-intensity conflict. (One research organization counted 39
active
low-intensity conflicts worldwide as of January 2001.) It is easy to foresee
an
inclination to build a force structure designed to deal with the most common
threat.  But these low-intensity conflicts, regardless of how pervasive they
are, do not represent as great a threat to the U.S. national interest as a
great power
conflict.

This mission must be secondary to protecting the United States against
threats
posed by great powers. Such a threat might emerge only once or twice in a
century, but that threat, if mismanaged, could prove catastrophic.

A small cadre of the Defense Department civilian leadership is carrying out
the
study. Complaints by uniformed military leaders that the armed services have
been
frozen out of the study have emerged already. As such, the Rumsfeld review
will
focus on only part of the issue: the force structure of the U.S. military.
It cannot, by definition, focus on U.S. grand strategy in the broadest sense
of defining a sensible alliance strategy or defining those sub-critical
conflicts in which Washington should intervene and those crises in which it
should not. Those issues are, appropriately, beyond the purview of the
Defense Department and belong to the White House and National Security
Council. Thus, in one sense, the Rumsfeld
review is being conducted in a vacuum. Creating a force structure requires a
set of strategic goals. That must come from the president and must derive,
ultimately,
from the nation's sense of itself and its needs.

From all reports, Rumsfeld is doing good work within the context of his
statutory
responsibilities. He is demanding a reconsideration of the foundations of
U.S.
defense policy and structure.

The whole point of a defense policy, however, is to prepare for the
unexpected.  The most unexpected event would be a major high-intensity
conflict with a great power.

Truly, this may only take place once in the century ahead. But Rumsfeld
should
take care that he does not prepare for the frequent and minor and leave the
U.S.
unprepared for the rare, but life-threatening, catastrophe.

************************************************************************************
Distributed through Cyber-Society-Live [CSL]: CSL is a moderated discussion
list made up of people who are interested in the interdisciplinary academic
study of Cyber Society in all its manifestations.To join the list please visit:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/cyber-society-live.html
*************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager