JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CETIS-PORTFOLIO Archives


CETIS-PORTFOLIO Archives

CETIS-PORTFOLIO Archives


CETIS-PORTFOLIO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CETIS-PORTFOLIO Home

CETIS-PORTFOLIO Home

CETIS-PORTFOLIO  2001

CETIS-PORTFOLIO 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: Identifiers

From:

"Dr A.C. Marshall" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ProFIMS project TECHNICAL GROUP mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:58:41 +0100

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (33 lines)

***NOTE: forwarded to profims-tech list for archival purposes only.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> The Brookes situation of having several identifiers for one student must
> be common, but  I presume that the HESA identifier can pull together the
> separate records to form a single institutional transcript.
>
> In discussing objects like these it may well be useful to refer to the
> HESA manuals.   Because all HEIs must complete HESA returns, all of their
> student records are likely to be influenced by its definitions.  Manuals
> mapping HESA and ISR are also available.
> http://www.hesa.ac.uk/Manuals/srcm.htm
>
> The best person to confirm 'what HEIs do now' will be a student record
> officer and we might think how we should pass on questions to Dennis
> Barrington Light and the reference group he has formed in SROC for their
> views, for example about how 'validation' and 'franchise' arrangements
> work in practice.
>
> At the end of the day we are not required to solve the (many) problems
> with the content of the transcript but to propose generic standards which
> will facilitate different but valid approaches, so we need to map current
> practice, confirm our framework will cope and refer on specific issues
> about content to the other bodies responsible.
>
> I have circulated the early draft providing loose definitions of the
> transcript fields to Paul and will hope to circulate them more generally
> next week.
>
> Peter
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2023
September 2022
April 2022
February 2022
September 2021
June 2021
April 2021
February 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
April 2020
September 2019
August 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
July 2014
April 2014
October 2013
July 2013
June 2013
November 2012
September 2012
August 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
November 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
April 2010
February 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
February 2009
January 2009
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager