JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives


CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives


CARIBBEAN-STUDIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Home

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Home

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES  2001

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

week in europe

From:

Amanda Sives <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Amanda Sives <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 14:19:07 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

The Week in Europe
 by David Jessop

On February 26 European ministers agreed to the European Commission's (EC)
'Everything but Arms' initiative and so took a decision that will have a
profound effect on the future of the Caribbean region.
 
While the overall initiative is welcome - it recognises the plight of the
poorest countries - it will have a serious impact on employment in every
more developed ACP nation producing sugar, rice and bananas. 

The measure has the effect of modifying unilaterally existing preferential
arrangements. It does so by extending duty and quota free access immediately
for all products entering the EU from the world's least developed countries
(LDCs). Only in the case of sugar, rice and bananas will full implementation
be delayed until 2006 (bananas) and 2009 (sugar and rice). Despite this,
special quotas for all three sensitive commodities will be opened
immediately at levels which suggest that Caribbean and other ACP producers
will loose from the end of this year as increasing and significant shares of
their European market. 

The decision by the EU Council of Ministers came after weeks of
inter-European argument about the need for special measures for the three
commodities in order that LDC exports would not disrupt prices and stability
in the carefully controlled European market. 

But despite Caribbean and ACP protestations that under the terms of the
Cotonou Convention signed in June 2000 they must be consulted, the EU
chooses not to see this as an issue. Rather, the intense debate that took
place involved EU states demanding concessions in order that their own
largely wealthy metropolitan agricultural producers were not disadvantaged.
As a result, more developed ACP nations now have to try to salvage what they
can through the hapless process of arguing after the event that impact
studies on the effect on ACP commodity producers must be undertaken and
discussed. 

For the more developed ACP nations the impact will be simple and direct.
Explaining this the Mauritius Prime Minister has informed European leaders
that the initiative will initially transfer highly needed benefits from
vulnerable small island states to the least developed countries. Then at a
later stage, markets will be disrupted with dire consequences for all
including the French Départements d'Outre Mer.

ACP sugar producers have amplified this. They suggest that the way in which
the EU decision is structured means that the negative impact will wholly be
borne by more developed ACP sugar producers, and it will be "the poor, not
the rich, who bear the brunt of an initiative to help the poorest".

As far as rice and bananas are concerned, the situation is little different.
In both cases, the market will be progressively disrupted as the new
arrangements, largely designed to protect European producers, result in less
competitive ACP producers being displaced from the EU market. 




For the Caribbean, the EU's decision on 'Everything but Arms' can be seen as
nothing other than a disaster. It is part of a sequence of trade decisions
whereby the EU uses wider trade policy considerations as the justification
to set aside existing preferential arrangements. In this context it is to
encourage the poorest developing countries to accept the opening of a new
WTO trade round. This latest decision is not unique .It follows similar
unilateral action to liberalise or reorganise the EU market for rum and
bananas without properly assessing the impact on commodity dependent
preferential suppliers or to determine a basis for compensation.

If there is any message in early 2lst century history, it is that powerful
trading blocs will liberalise irrespective of the consequences for
developing countries and then only under pressure consider a basis for
compensation or amelioration of the effects. 

Despite this, the region and its producers cannot be excluded from blame.
For too long Caribbean industries and governments have behaved as if
protocol arrangements with Europe will continue forever. The reality is that
nothing is forever. Unless industries develop early, creative, practical,
forward-looking solutions with government, the region will always find
itself reacting after the event and disadvantaged.

Caribbean Governments and regional institutions seem to have failed to
understand that the world has changed. Unless powerful lobbyists, the
Diaspora and other interested parties are funded and mobilised in support of
well-considered strategies where decisions are being taken, the region will
continue to loose. 

On the horizon are a number of key trade negotiations. These include a new
world trade organisation round which looks set to begin later this year.
This year will also see the probable acceleration of the process to
establish a Free Trade Area of the Americas. This will almost certainly be
the most important element in the forthcoming summit of the Americas in
Quebec in April.  Further trade negotiations are set for Brussels and
Geneva.

Despite this, how well prepared is the region? It is one thing to indulge in
rhetoric, letter writing and concern about process and quite another to
achieve positive results based on a coherent well-delivered strategy. While
tourism and the service sector may well represent the future of the
Caribbean, politicians will find before very long they will reap the
whirlwind of social unrest if they allow traditional industries to collapse
before a full transition can be made to a newer Caribbean economy. 

The EBA decision in Brussels should indicate in the starkest possible terms
that world trade is now moving against the interests of regions such as the
Caribbean. While resources are limited, future generations will not forgive
today's politicians if they do not rapidly develop a coherent and integrated
strategy to deal with these the biggest threats the region has ever faced. 

David Jessop is the Executive Director of the Caribbean Council for Europe.
And can be contacted at [log in to unmask] March 2nd, 2001 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager