Found one. The culturally sensitive Dillon is to be toward the end of the email.
The rest is just the pure Kim Il Sung sort of in depth analysis that Dillon is
noted for though he does make an early reference to diet and makes light of
famine. CP

Subj:    Re: Send This To Lacan Wherever -
Date:   05/20/2001 9:21:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time
From:   [log in to unmask]
Reply-to:   <A HREF="mailto:[log in to unmask]">
[log in to unmask]</A> (Subsubpoetics)
To: [log in to unmask] (Subsubpoetics)

Subsubpoetics

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Apropos Kim Il Sung's playpen:  Tell us about the whole case of North Korea?
Or about the diet of your comrades under successive Kremlin tyrants?
What a load of crap:  "Climate.."  Can't their komrades to the North
help 'em out?

Let's  see if you can take some responsibility here.  Your side is
represented by military tyrannies.  Please don't niggle out of it and
claim that Amerika is behind these evils. Cite a Republican Democracy
Commisar Communist FreeLand Republic, Ms. Mao.  Maybe it's on freeon
in a crumpled copy of Chomsky somewhere in The Haight.

You didn't respond to the Bradford quip.  Tell us about the grain
warehouses at Plymouth and how you folks pitched in and built the
common wealth to toast the commisars and Lenin's great great grand
dad.  TELL!

The WESTERN world you despise is DINING tonight.  Love it or leave
it.  You have the choice.  At least on July 4 we don't eat REAL DOGS!

At least I'm not sauced with the propaganda of Kim Il Sung, as you
are.  Take a another toke or toot, whatever.


>Subsubpoetics
>
>--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
>Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

"R.Gancie/C.Parcelli" wrote:

> You insinuate I'm lying and then you want to call a halt.
>
> Don't worry, Robin, if Dillon said he didn't say "dog eaters", you can still
> publish a liar since apparently your more than willing to defend one.
>
> And this after Dillon's responses on this list, and you have Anastasios'
> confirmation of what I experienced on subsub.  The ethical crisis is yours and
> Candace's not mine.  CP
>
> Robin Hamilton wrote:
>
> > From: "R.Gancie/C.Parcelli"
> >
> > > Ask Dillon. CP
> > >
> > > Robin Hamilton wrote:
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > > > > "dog eaters";
> >
> > Oh I will, sweetheart, I will -- but I notice you don't provide any
> > citations.
> >
> > My evidence (two month's records from the end of subsub) may be inadequate,
> > but it's the best shot I've got in my locker.
> >
> > Frankly, a response to a request for documentation of "Dillon says Koreans
> > eat dogs" in terms of "Ask Dillon. CP" strikes me as avoidance.  Either you
> > have evidence for this, or you're bullshitting.
> >
> > I didn't say Richard didn't say it -- I said that in the material I have,
> > there's no evidence for him having said it.
> >
> > Your reply is simply pathetic.
> >
> > Oof!!  Elizabeth's right -- let's call a halt to this.  It's going nowhere
> > and the temperature is rising by the minute.
> >
> > A reverse of McNeice's:
> >
> > "The glass is falling hour by hour, the glass will fall forever,
> >  But if you break the bloody glass, you won't hold up the weather."
> >
> > Robin