Linda
Thanks for this announcement.
Before responding - do you know whether this is open to Departments in Wales
(and Scotland)?
Because we (in Wales, at least) had a different subject review scheme, with
non-numerical outcomes, and have not been published in the recent Subject
Overview Report, it might suggest that we are excluded, by virtue of not
being perceived as a "high scoring department".
Tim
Tim Coward
Head of School
Cardiff School of Art & Design
University of Wales Institute, Cardiff
Howard Gardens
Cardiff CF24 0SP
Wales
UK
tel: +44 (0)29 2041 6647
fax: +44 (0)29 2041 6944
email: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 26 April 2001 17:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: URGENT! FDTL 4 Art and Design Consultation
on priorities
> FDTL 4 Art and Design Consultation on priorities
>
> The Fund for the Development and Teaching and Learning is
soon to launch
> phase 4 of it's funding which includes all subjects
reviewed in the last
> phase of QAA Subject Review.
>
> For examples of projects already funded in phases 1-3 see
www.nct.ac.uk
> and for an edited selection of projects that relate to our
subject areas
> see our web site at www.bton.ac.uk/adc-ltsn
>
> Cliff Allen, LTSN Programme Director, has said:
>
> "The objective is to try to relate FDTL 4 projects to the
actual
> enhancement and improvement needs of the subjects.
Previously FDTL funded
> projects did not always meet the key priorities of
> the subject. The aim is to try to embed practice and so if
the projects
> which are funded relate to need there is a greater chance
of achieving
> this.
>
> As you know FDTL relates to the QAA process - projects
will only be
> funded in high scoring departments. In terms of need,
HEFCE would like to
> see some relationship between the outcomes of the QAA
reviews and the
> enhancement activity funded as well as the activity being
closely aligned
> to the subject's needs/priorities.
>
> You are asked to produce a number of key priorities/needs
for the
> disciplines recently reviewed by QAA. Please can these
relate, if possible
> to the outcomes of the QAA reviews. You will also wish to
try to gauge
> views within the disciplines about their perceptions of
the key
> enhancement/improvement priorities in the light of the QAA
reviews and
> other evidence.
>
> You may wish to focus on a limited number of needs to
ensure that the
> funded
> projects have a focus and are not too disparate in nature
and form."
>
> This is being sent to both GLADNET and ADC-LTSN JISCmail
lists as well as
> to QAA subject reviewers and to as many heads of
departments of Art and
> Design as possible.
>
> The task
> I am asking you to give us your comments by close of play
Tuesday 1st May
> - I know this is a tight time frame but this is an
important issue so I
> have produced a summary of issues from the subject
overview report for Art
> and Design (available on the QAA web site at
www.qaa.ac.uk) and from the
> report of the November 2000 conference of GLAD. Please
feel free to add or
> comment on the priorities identified here:
>
> * Assessment - use of assessment criteria
(relationship to learning
> outcomes and teaching and learning activities); engagement
with subject
> specific learning outcomes; grading and assessment bands;
feedback to
> students and relationship to learning outcomes; assessment
of learning
> process (not products); role of the learner in assessment
> * Learning - development of critical and analytical
skills;
> integration of reflective practice in learning
> * Employability - relationship to programmes of
personal and
> professional development; work experience and work based
learning; student
> profiling and records of achievement; links with employers
and industry in
> the learning process; redefinition of 'employment' in
relation to
> lifelong learning needs
> * Learning resources - management of independent
learning; learner
> information management skills; incorporating learning
technologies into
> learner managed learning; role of technicians and
demonstrators in the
> learning process
> * Quality enhancement - induction and mentoring of
part-time staff
> into learning and teaching culture and practices; peer
observation of
> teaching to enhance learning and teacher development;
continuous
> professional development of teaching staff in learning and
teaching;
> evaluation of the learning process which actively involves
the learners
>
> Linda Drew
> Subject Centre Manager
> Art, Design and Communication
> Learning and Teaching Support Network
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|