On 1 Oct 2001, at 11:57, G.D.Williams wrote:
> No specifics, but attended a seminar recently where a conservation
> planner recognised that for a listed building, there would be
> circumstances where a listed frontage, steps, entrance could not be
> changed.
But why should conservation officers have the power to deny a
person access to a building? Which is more important in today's
society life or an inanimate creation provided for no other reason
than shelter, place of work or leisure?
Conservation officers impose their own personal views on society
as a whole, without any consideration for the needs of others. To
deny access to a building on grounds of 'conservation' must surely
contravene both DDA and Human Rights Act.
> It was considered that proof of a planning application refused, would
> probably excuse not having provided a ramp or chairlift to a main
> public entrance.
That may be the case that an employer/provider may argue, but
perhaps the DDA (and offences under) should be extended to
include those using other legislation to precvent access for all.
> Health and Safety at Work Act is specific legislation mentioned
> by DDA and DDA as being legislation that might exclude
> compliance with DDA.
Can you expand on this point?
Regards
Roger Jarvis FCIOB FASI
Should you need to contact me other than by email
Tel/Fax: 01453 751749
Internet Site: http://www.roger.jarvis.surveying.mcmail.com
----------End of Message----------
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
You can JOIN or Leave the list from this web page as well
|