> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dawkins Ceridwen
> Sent: 03 December 2001 15:26
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Usefulness of interpretative comments on reports
>
> Replying as an individual:
> Locally I did a survey of all lab users,Hosp and GP,approx a year ago.
> To the question,how useful are the above comments:
> 16% said essential,51% very useful,16% reasonable,3%not very useful,2%
> unnecessary, 14% would like more!
>
> To the question,where results are equivocal an interpretation may be made
> or doubts cast on their significance.How useful is this?:
> 96% replied useful,4% not. No GP replied not useful.
>
> Individual free script replies[ of which there were a lot] suggested
> comments particularly appreciated on endocrine abnormalities,anything
> unusual and isolated,further questions to be asked or ideas for further
> investigation,explanations,thinking points,possible diagnosis,advice on
> next move,etc..
> Personally,therefore,I will continue,
> Ceridwen Dawkins,
> Frenchay Hospital,
> Bristol
>
>
|