Dear SPMers, hi John-
is there a reason for having the TINY-parameter set the way it is, i.e. is
the a downside of resetting it the way you have previously adviced for
obtaining more data from the realignment? I am also running an experiment
with very few slices and was considering to redefine TINY. Notably, when I
do exclude about half of 3200 images in my time series to reduce the motion
in it, I get less data (i.e. fewer voxels) surviving in the r*-images. Has
somebody seen something like that before, how can you explain it? (I may
provide more detailed information and images to illustrate my point.)
TIA-
Andreas
|