>I don't how you conceive logic to be
>only partial to language.
Read Wittgenstein again, but first take off your egocentric blinkers.
I was simply attempting to say in a few sentences what I thought
Wittgenstein actually said, as opposed to the gobbledegook you've made of
him. It wasn't what I said. Give him a call. I'm sure he'd set you
straight.
Perhaps you could do some reading in contemporary neurology.
I'm out of this.
Alison
|