The caffiene content of coffee is greater than tea. Here is why. In the drip
method the coffee is not comminuted as much as tea. For instance in espresso
coffee the caffiene content is 5 times greater:
http://www.cosic.org/caffeine/index.html
Espresso (30 ml cup) has 40 mg of caffiene
Tea (150 ml cup) has 40 mg of caffiene
Coffee has five times more caffiene than coffee. So it really depends on how
the coffee is ground and how it is prepared.
Isaac Newton according to Carolyn Merchant in the "Death of Nature" drank so
much coffee that he suffered from insomnia, or caffiene anxiety, which
contributed to his death. Zombies are living dead. Coffee could prevent the
living from dying with their eyes closed. She also writes that the
scientific revolution was caused in part by the heavy ingestion of coffee;
coffee originally came from Africa.
Francis Bacon also drank lots of coffee apparently...and wrote the Masculine
Conception of Time....Did men conceive time?
Well if everyone is awake and alert, and sleep is purely overated, then
Reason can flourish around the clock..the reason for this proposition is
that if many people stay up in the night, then they have only their
imaginations to use for diversions. Thus it is plausible that with the
modern heated home, lots of cadfeee, or black tea, that this kick started
the scientific revolution.
Coffee increases alertness and Finnish people apparently drink the most
coffee in the world (not a rumour but I did read this once in an article)
presumably because of the long winter nights (more Seasonally Affective
Disorder) there.
Caffiene inducted death is indicated by symptoms found in the living dead
who appear to die with eye lids fully open, or resemble Zombies on
Banistropis. Well the effect of caffiene would be similar to Banistropis,
which makes people into zombies, or the living dead.
If coffee contributed to the scientific revolution by increasing alertness
and synaptic connections within the cerebrum, then can some environmental
and ethical issues be resolved by taking or ingesting more caffiene? Can the
reverse of taking no caffiene reduce environmental impacts.
It was reported in a scientific journal that men who drink coffee have sperm
that swim faster. Do they therefore have more children than those who do not
drink coffee. And if they did not drink coffee, then would they go to sleep
longer, and therefore not engage as often? Of course both partners must be
more alert....so what about not drinking coffee and tea to help the
environment?
It seems plausible that coffee, tea, and yerba matte are the cause of
overpopulation, and environmental distruction. A form of temporary
insanity...but if so then can caffiene be used to reverse the process of
overpopulation. Look at the Seventh Day Adventists, and Mormons who don't
engage at all in drinking coffee and tea; they are such a small segment of
society, and they seem to have no problems overpopulating their own valleys.
Coffee drinkers are more fertile in many ways: in science, in reproduction,
and in fertilizing lawns....
john foster
|