>
>By the way, Whelan's _Toxic Terror_ can be put in the same category as
>Lomborg's _Skeptical Environmentalist_.
oh, and what category is that, SB?
:-)
jt
>
>Steven
>
>But the proper response to this hypothesis
>is that there are always people willing to
>believe anything, however implausible, merely
>in order to be contrary.
> Vikram Seth
> A Suitable Boy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Discussion forum for environmental ethics.
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jim Tantillo
>Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:05 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Calling all bias detectives: a request
>
>
>I need help rooting out the reasons why Elizabeth Whelan is an
>anti-environmentalist and why the organization she works for is evil.
>
>Clues can be found at: http://www.acsh.org/about/profiles/bethwhelan.html
>
>Thanks for any and all help you can provide.
>
>Jim T.
|