Thanks for your patience during the list reconfiguration.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:12:43 -0700 James Giles
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> "Dan Nagle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> ...
> > I would greatly prefer reply-to going to the list.
> > The default should fit the 9 out of 10 case, not the infrequent case.
>
> I agree. However, there should be another change. After
> the list was rehosted last year, the headers were changed
> so that *both* the Reply-To: and the Sender: headers pointed
> to the list. You can't get to the original sender without
> digging his address out of the headers (which is very
> indirect in my reader).
mine too.
>In my opinion, the Reply-To: header
> should be the F90 list, since that's where the majority of
> responses will go. But, the Sender: header should be the
> original author's reply address - so that I don't have to dig
> for it.
i agree.
>
> As it presently is, if I select the "reply" option, I get the
> list's address. And if I select the "reply to all" option
> I get two copies of the list's address. It used to be that
> "reply" went to the original author, and "reply to all"
> went to both the list and the author. I preferred that to
> what we have, but my above suggestion would be even
> better.
I as list owner can't alter the
sender
and
reply to
to be different
I'm going to contact jiscmail tomorrow about this.
The documentation seems to have the interpretation
I expected but thought might be ambiguous.
>
> --
> J. Giles
--
Ian
[log in to unmask]
Home page
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/kis/support/cit//fortran/
comp-fortran-90 home page
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/comp-fortran-90.html
|