JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  December 2000

ACAD-AE-MED December 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Intensity supplements

From:

[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The list will be of relevance to all trainees including undergraduates and <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:51:33 GMT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (77 lines)

My views on the competency of those "negotiating" for
Consultants need to be screened by a libel lawyer
before publication.
I have sought clarification from the BMA secretariat on
the ambiguous areas in the questionnaire (ie most of
the questions.)

In the interim I would suggest that Consultants fill in
the questionnaire in what ever way gives them the
greatest advantage but should attach a note to the
effect that this has been done on the basis of a certain
interpretation of the questions. I suggest writing down
that interpretation and filing it in case changes are
needed later.

In the longer term I intend to try and take a motion of
no confidence in the CCSC Negotiators to the BMA
Conferences. They wont pass it but it just might make
them address the issue properly in the next phase of
negotiations - ie when they try and renegotiate the
whole contract.

Andrew Hobart

>
>The British A&E consultants on the List may be filling
out their Out of >Hours Work Intensity Questionnaire at
the moment. I, like many of my A&E >colleagues, feel
that I have one of the highest, if not the highest, OOH
>intensities in the hospital. So I was disappointed to fill
out my >questionnaire and only score 75 odd points
putting me in Band 1-2! For >scoring see:
http://www.doh.gov.uk/hrbulletin/intensity.htm
>
>I realise the catch however...the DOH base OOH
intensity on four types >of work as follows:
>
>1    the on-call commitment worked by the consultant
>2    expectation of being telephoned/contacted outside
the hospital
>3    expectation of being called back into workplace for
emergency work
>4    work necessarily performed out of hours
>
>My problem is that the work is so intense I can't/don't
go home much >before midnight on my nights on call,
some 7 nights every 28 days. So I >hardly score at all
for points 2 and 3 above, although I score highly >for
numbers 1 and 4 above. But it seems you have to score
highly in all >four areas to get anywhere near Band 3!
The scoring system seems grossly >unfair for those of
us who are effectively resident or near resident >on-call,
as so many points are allocated for phone calls or
returns to >work which we cannot legitimately claim. I
deliberately stay in work >late on my on-call nights to
provide a better service, yet I would score >far higher if
I simply went home and received lots of telephone calls
>and returns to work. Are resident consultants therefore
going to be >penalised or can we count the multiple
consultations as tantamount to >phone calls or returns
to work? Can someone who is also >semi-
resident/resident on-call shed some light on this? Do
BAEM have a >view? Andrew, do you have advice to
offer?
>
>Apologies for the purely political post, but I feel we
need to have a >unified approach to this as a specialty,
and we have only weeks in which >to respond to our
Trusts.
>
>Adrian Fogarty
>A&E Consultant
>Royal Free Hospital
>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager