The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  November 2000

DISABILITY-RESEARCH November 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Don't Move On - THE HOMOPHOBIA ISSUE..PLEASE READ

From:

GRACE Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

GRACE Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:01:00 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (166 lines)

I agree with Sharon in that homosexual issues should be an open and active
discussion within the parameters of Disability Studies. For a student in
disability studies, your "minimal resources" upon which you illustrated your
points were most compelling.

There was also something that John stated that particularly generated my
interest, especially in light of current debates that swirl around the
Disability Community establishing coalitions with other oppressed minorities.

John stated,

'Unless we are going to suggest that homosexuality and marriage are disabling
conditions, I am not sure that the current discussion is wholly
appropriate'.--  "Homosexuals" experience very real "disabling conditions" on
a daily basis at the hands of societies homophobic and heterosexist attitudes
and actions.'


What exactly are "disabling conditions?" In this example it seems to portray a
situation in which the social environment causes a disablement of social
function - not because of a difference in physical body or cognitive ability -
but because of a difference in gender preference.  If one does not have an
impairment, can they still be socially disabled in light of how society
determines just how far outside of its perfect circle of hegemonic acceptance
one stands?  If we consider Disability to be a social construct, apart from
impairment, then who's to say that Social Disability couldn't be experienced
by others who are oppressed by the reigning social power structure?

What would happen in the term "Disability" became more global in its
interpretation - I've used "Social Disability" here -  and in doing so
included those in "disabling conditions?"  Without for one moment minimizing
the experiences or validity of those individuals with impairments, could such
a concept be promoted with a goal of unification and impact towards the
dismantling of social oppression for all people?


Ann Cameron Williams
University of Illinois
Disability Studies PhD student






>===== Original Message From [log in to unmask] =====
>Dear John,
>
>    I wanted to respond to your email...in a non-hostile way of course.  I
>found some of your statements to be problematic and exclusionary.
>
>You wrote:
>
>>my understanding is that this list is for the discussion of issues relating
>to
>>disabilities and research and thinking within that specific area.  Unless we
>are
>>going to suggest that homosexuality and marriage are disabling conditions,
>>I am not sure that the current discussion is wholly appropriate.
>
>It is my understanding that the focus of disability studies is not (or should
>not be) as myopic as you suggest.  An email sent to Philip on this listserve
>by [log in to unmask] sums up this point:
>
>    "I think that disability studies deals with people who have been and are
>marginalized in our societies.  Lesbians, gay men, transgendered people
>bisexuals --not so long ago the term of art was "sexual deviants" -- have
>been and are similarly marginalized.  There is significant overlap between
>the power to define "sexual deviance" and "cripple."  And of course, the
>scholars and the studied in Disability studies are not exclusively
>heterosexual.  While I may not yet understand all the ins and outs of this
>marginalization, its history and continuing strength, I do firmly believe
>that people engaged in disability studies must respect people in their full
>diversity."
>
>Homophobia and heterosexism are extremely valid issues for discussion in this
>venue.  Not only valid, but imperative!  There is little research present in
>disability studies that is inclusive of individuals who experience multiple
>layers of oppression; specifically lesbians/gays/bisexuals/transgendered with
>disabilities.
>
>"Corbett (1994) argues that disabled gay men and lesbians experience a form
>of 'double invisibility' because they feel that 'I am invisible in the
>lesbian and gay community as a disabled person, as lesbians and gays are in
>the straight community and I feel I am invisible as a lesbian in the
>disability community' (p. 355)" (Shakespeare,  1998).
>
>"To date almost all research on disabled men and women seems to assume the
>irrelevance of gender, race, ethnicity, *sexual orientation*, or social
>class.  Having a disability presumably eclipses these dimensions of social
>experience"  (Fine and Asch,  1998).
>
>"The majority of literature on disabled women assumes them to be Caucasian
>and physically disabled...voices of disabled lesbians were minimal if at all
>present...the lives and accomplishments of disabled lesbians are completely
>invisible."  (O'toole and Bregante,  1993)
>
>This lack of research and validation in disability studies is exclusionary
>and adds to a general feeling of 'disconformation'.  Marginalization and
>hierarchy within the majority group occurs as a result.  It seems to me that
>disability scholars are playing a complicit part in societal discriminatory
>practices.  The resulting departmental compartmentalization within disability
>studies is disheartening to say the least.
>
>"While many disability organizations support other human rights and equality
>seeking groups, they are not exempt from being part of the hegemony of
>discrimination against 'others'."  (Barile, 2000)
>
>Therefore, John, when you describe your understanding of this list as
>involving 'discussions relating to disabilities and research and thinking
>within that specific area'; I agree with you completely and this 'specific
>area' most definitely includes (or should include) issues of multiple
>minority status and experiences of layered oppression which queer disabled
>persons are all too familiar with.
>
>In regard to your statement 'Unless we are going to suggest that
>homosexuality and marriage are disabling conditions, I am not sure that the
>current discussion is wholly appropriate'.--  "Homosexuals" experience very
>real "disabling conditions" on a daily basis at the hands of societies
>homophobic and heterosexist attitudes and actions.  Again, this fact is
>demonstrated within disability studies scholarship and disability community:
>
>"Disability theorists ought to consider, therefore, how heterosexism and
>homophobia skew the design of research projects in disability studies."
>(Tremain,  2000)
>
>"Building on the premises brought forth by the social model (Oliver 1990,
>1996) which positions the primary problems in the disabling society, the
>process can begin by reviewing how direct and indirect discrimination based
>on gender, race, class, sexual orientation and specific impairment that
>exists in the external social structure was transmitted into our movement
>creating exclusionary practices therein." (Barile, 2000)
>
>In the case of Sharon Kowalski:  "One of the leaders in the disability rights
>community told me,  'We think Sharon's rights are being violated, but we
>can't afford to get involved in a gay rights issue'  (Thomson, quoted by
>O'Toole and Bregante, 1993)
>
>Queer persons with disabilities experience invisibility within greater
>society...why should that be so amongst supposed comrades in disability
>community and within disability studies?  This invisibility is precisely the
>'disabling condition' that prompts my argument that this list serve is the
>appropriate and necessary place for a discussion of this kind.
>
>This post is not meant to be taken as hostile or deprecatory.  On the
>contrary, it is meant to raise awareness for the need of more inclusive
>research and practice within disability studies.  As a student in disability
>studies who is quite interested in this area, I have minimal resources to
>draw upon for my research.  Tremain, O'Toole, Corker, Shakespeare, Barile
>have contributed a tremendous amount, but it seems that the issue of
>queerness remains absent in much of the disability scholarship that is out
>there.   Hence my question for my critical literature analysis in Carol Gill
>and Joy Hammel's Disability 501 class....WHERE IS THE QUEER VOICE IN
>DISABILITY STUDIES??????        (Sorry about the oralist metaphor)
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Sharon P Smith
>U of I at Chicago
>Disability Studies PhD student




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager