Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> So [3] looks pretty good to me. An acknowledgement of XHTML's current
> status is the only thing I'd personally like to see added. In
> other words, it is no longer accurate to refer to it as "future
> versions of HTML" -- XHTML is a W3C REC,
> [3] http://www.ned.dem.csiro.au/metadata/qdchtml/REC-QDCHTML-20000504.html
The latest (August 16) draft [1] corrected the reference to XHTML,
but I agree that another sentence or two could be added.
BTW - the links on the charter should point to *this* draft [1], which has
been available for nearly 3 months, and also to the issues list [2].
[1] http://www.ned.dem.csiro.au/metadata/qdchtml/
[2] http://www.ned.dem.csiro.au/metadata/qdchtml/issues.html
--
[log in to unmask] CSIRO Exploration & Mining
T:+61(8) 9284 8443 F:+61(8) 9389 1906 M:0403 302 672
http://www.ned.dem.csiro.au/research/visualisation/
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|