True. But to back up Belsey (and Frances Batycki), Milton, in the Doctrine
and Discipline of Divorce, does refer to the "wanting soul," thus perfectly
blending lack and desire, desire arising from lack.
Peter C. Herman
At 02:37 PM 10/19/00 -0400, you wrote:
>>But if desire is, as Catherine Belsey puts it so succinctly, "the
>>experience of lack" the future tense increases that experience in a way
>>the demands of the present tense cannot. The "I want it now" may be the
>>present tense expression, but the future tense indicates that the
>>speaker lives the experience of lack and always lives in expectation and
>>tension with a future satisfying of his/ her desire.
>writes Frances Batycki.
>
>Perhaps Belsey is wrong. I experience desire most strongly in the presence
>of the loved one, not when the loved one is lacked -- or if you will
>absent. And, of course, I can be satiated and still desire dessert. You
>may read that sentence as metaphor, if you desire.
>
>And, of course, no one is ever satisfied (or desirous) in the future.
>Longing for the future may be linked to nostalgia for the past. We still
>live and desire and long -- right now, this very now.
>
>Yours, Bill Godshalk
>**********************************************
>* W. L. Godshalk *
>* Professor, Department of English *
>* University of Cincinnati *
>* Cincinnati OH 45221-0069 * Stellar Disorder
>* [log in to unmask] *
>*
> *
>**********************************************
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|