Susan Oldrieve wrote:-
> Excuse my confusion, but I just don't see how the whole canon of English
> Renaissance literature could have been written by one man stealing other
> people's names. Why would anyone do such a thing, and what hard--i.e.
> undebatably, historically valid--evidence do you have to support any of your
> theories?
My research into Marlowe being 'Shakespeare' was published around
this time last year. During that research, it became apparent that he also
used other names. Since then the floodgates have opened. I now have
his aliases up to about 55 !
Benjamin Franklin and Voltaire had many times that amount but it has
made things very complicated for me. I am trying to obtain all the info
that I can about all of those people whose names he pinched.
Most of the names were used after he was exiled in 1593 and forbidden
to use his own. Have you not heard references to a "concealed poet"
during that period? It was Marlowe...
Nothing has been known about his life before he enrolled at the
Kings School, just before his 15th birthday. I have traced his life
back to the age of EIGHT. He was a child prodigy and much of
his early stuff was too risque to be published as being by a child.
He was using pseudonyms from then onwards; the first being
'John Fisher' and his first published work being 'The Adventures
of Master FJ'.
When I have it all sorted, I will publish the full story.
> I'm sorry, but your points really do sound uncredible to me.
I don't expect you to believe me without the facts. It seems
incredible to me also. I have been working on this for four
years now and all pieces of the jig-saw fit. All I have to do
is to sort it out and get it down on paper.
Watch this space!
Peter Zenner
+44 (0) 1246 271726
Visit my web site 'Zenigmas' at
http://www.pzenner.freeserve.co.uk
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|