It is not only our right to question current schools of thought, but it is
our responsibility. If Dr. Barnes did not want the field to discuss his
work in an open forum, then he should not have published in a public forum.
And, the last time I checked, this listserve is for us, a students of the
disability community, to discuss issues with our global colleagues.
Interesting that you take such a defensive posture.
I also find it very interesting that you "confidently confirm" that Colin
Barnes is not guilty of questionable reactions, yet you also "presume not to
speak" for either one; appearing to me, like an excellent example of a
contradiction. I have not at all spoken for either of the two authors; the
words and questions were my own and also of my fellow students who were
engaged in this dialogue. And, by the way, I do not need permission to
express such thoughts.
This is not about dodging real critiques of a scholarly work. This is about
identifying the real issues embedded in the critique of a scholarly work.
If, as a white, middle class male, prejudices exist, and if these prejudices
affect the course of our studies, then you have validated my questions.
Facing up to them can only refine out dedication to seeking out truths in
the Academy.
Ann Cameron Williams
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Light [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 10:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: What is Simi's name had been Sammy?
Ann
We can construct divisive difference wherever our imagination takes us.
Accepting that as a white, middle-class male, I must have prejudices and
taken-for-granted assumptions, I can nonetheless confidently confirm that
Colin Barnes has, to my knowledge, studiously avoided the self-promoting,
other-indicting route that you suggest.
There is a very real danger that criticism such as his is seen as attacking
a 'woman', or an 'American' - both issues that leave one open to
vilification, but the Colin I know, have worked with and respect, is guilty
of nothing more than plain-speaking.
In view of the now popular critique of disability theory constructed by
those of us who are wheelchair-users, I can also confirm that Colin is not
tainted by that characteristic either.
As an alternative proposition - might not your willingness to construct
reality in this way be patronising to Simi Linton who, I am quite sure, is
more than capable of 'speaking' for herself.
I fear that that the sometimes dubious quality of what some describe as
'Disability Studies', combined with the contemporary predilection for
'deconstruction' will do more to frustrate the goals of emancipation and
inclusion of disabled people than any neoliberal politician.
I would not presume to speak for either Simi Linton or Colin Barnes;
neither can I avoid asking what possible benefit there is to yet more
personal attacks in the disability community. Simi and Colin have
expressed their views, it is for us to weigh the evidence - not seek to
damn the individuals involved.
Richard Light
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|