JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-ELIB Archives


LIS-ELIB Archives

LIS-ELIB Archives


LIS-ELIB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-ELIB Home

LIS-ELIB Home

LIS-ELIB  July 2000

LIS-ELIB July 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: The July 6-7 NYAM "Freedom of Information" Meeting (fwd)

From:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 9 Jul 2000 09:50:46 +0100 (BST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (134 lines)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 20:27:54 -0400
From: Michael Jacobson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: September 1998 American Scientist Forum
     <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The July 6-7 NYAM "Freedom of Information" Meeting

I was also at this meeting, and agree with Barry's assessment.  There were
only two people who argued forcefully and eloquently for radically revamping
the copyright status and wresting control from publishers: Barry and Pat
Brown.

A few other, personal, observations about the meeting.

The PubMedCentral people were strangely muted and gave very little
information about their actual plans.  In one of the first talks,
PubMedCentral was stridently attacked by Pieter Bolman of Academic Press who
seems also to be a spokesman for the CrossRef project.  CrossRef is
basically a way to make it easier to access on-line articles, without in any
way tampering with the S/L/P system, and seems to be the publisher's answer
to PubMedCentral.  The PubMedCentral folks had little to say in reply.  I
had the feeling that they are still licking their wounds from their initial
foray into the field, which resulted in a vehement counterattack from
biomedical publishers and a quick retreat to a more "acceptable" position.

The assessment that made the most sense to me came from an editor belonging
to the Physics organization AIP (I can't remember his name).  He predicted
that the major, leading journals will continue to flourish and be able to
dictate their terms to authors, simply because of the power of their
prestige.  On the other hand, the majority of lesser-status journals, which
currently exist mainly to enable authors to publish, will fall prey to
various open-archiving projects and many will simply disappear.

Pat Brown called upon authors to boycott all journals that don't behave like
"good scientific citizens".  I got up and said that I don't think there is a
single scientist who would boycott the New England Journal of Medicine if it
accepted an article, on the basis that the NEJM isn't a good scientific
citizen.  He disagreed with me, and said that he, for one, wouldn't publish
in it.  Made me feel young again, like I was at an anti-war rally in the
60's...

The folks you have to feel sorry for are the academic society publishers.
Their hearts are in the right place, and they're used to being on the
morally "right" side of things, while making money for their organizations.
Now, their economic viability is threatened by the new environment, and they
just don't have the real capitalist competitive fire that commercial
publishers do.  Sort of like the not-for-profit hospitals in the US, that
used to "do well by doing good", and are now struggling to survive in the
waters of corporate medicine.  Not easy.

Michael Jacobson


-------------------------------------
Michael Jacobson, MD, MPH
Journal Club on the Web
http://www.journalclub.org/
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: September 1998 American Scientist Forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Barry
Markovitz
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 2:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: The July 6-7 NYAM "Freedom of Information" Meeting


The New York Academy of Medicine meeting

    "Freedom of Information The Impact of Open Access on Biomedical
    Science" http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/conference.asp

was fascinating. Although it was put on by BioMed Central, it had
almost nothing about BioMed Central on the agenda. Fiona Godlee, after
multiple requests, did explain their ideas and model to us, but for a
meeting to bring visibility to themselves, they maintained a very low
profile.

You could claim that they set the agenda, literally, and could have
or should have invited known proponents of other models. But very few
of us actually stuck to our assigned topics, and everyone took the
"bully pulpit" to state their positions. When Harold Varmus opened
the program, he clearly outlined that we should be experimenting now
with various models (and be sure to study what we are doing) - no one
suggested there was only one model to follow. (Except perhaps the
entrenched publishers! :-)

I must say though that the issue of author self-archiving was not
discussed in great length. I mentioned it certainly, along with the
whole problem of copyright transfer, but the majority of the
attendees (being from the publishing world) were focused on the
questions of cooperation with PubMed Central, participation with
CrossRef, and the economic uncertainties of the open access world.

One fascinating point came across that we are all aware of but I
suspect is more important than we'd like to admit, at least in the
biomedical world. Pat Brown said the reason authors are not flocking
to the open access alternatives currently available is because it is
like a rat who has always lived in a cage. Just because the cage door
is open does not mean the rat will immediately want to escape the
only world they've known. Peter Singer (U Toronto) said the reason
the rat will stay in the cage is that is where their food and water
are and have always been. Until we ensure that scientists and
scholars will receive the same level of recognition for publishing in
open access worlds, e.g., BioMed Central, then they will stay in
their proverbial cages. Despite the incredibly narrow view on this
issue from the New England Journal of Medicine, few medical authors
would turn down the chance to publish there, even with its
restrictive attitude, compared to the unknown recognition associated
with something like BioMed Central. We are all self-serving creatures
in our own way.

I'm told they will put the proceedings of the meeting on the web.
Several people asked me for a copy of my "slides" (Powerpoint
presentation on disk), so I will be making that available for
downloading shortly.

__________________________________________________
Barry P. Markovitz, MD
Pediatric Anesthesiology/Critical Care
St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine
email: [log in to unmask]   WWW: http://PedsCCM.org
voice: 314-454-6215   fax: 314-454-2296
___________________________________________________



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
January 2024
December 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
February 2022
December 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
May 2021
September 2020
October 2019
March 2019
February 2019
August 2018
February 2018
December 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
September 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager