Yes, it seems vital to me that the online version should be corrected at
the same time as the printed version. Indeed, an enquiry should be
made as to how common this is. If the online version is always
provisional, we should know this. And if a change is rare, a note
should be inserted on each occasion to indicate that the text has been
changed.
Sue Pettit wrote:
>
> Thanks to Tim Kelly for the fax of C-68/94 and 30/95 as printed in ECR 1
> 1998, which confirmed that a different phrase is used in the print
> compared to the online versions (Court of Justice Web site and Eurolaw
> checked today)
> This has serious implications for those considering relying on
> the Internet and disposing of the printed reports...
> Apparently the difference arose because it was realised that the
> original English translation that appeared online was not clear, and
> this was corrected before it was published in print.
> Should we be lobbying for any such alterations to be made to the online
> version as well?
> Sue
> ----------------------
> Sue Pettit
> [log in to unmask]
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Goodwillie
Official Publications Librarian, European Documentation Centre
Trinity College Library
College Street
Dublin 2
Ireland
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
tel: +353-1-608-2342
fax: +353-1-671-9003
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|