First I've known about it. You are obviously much closer to the problem than
I am - the last I heard was they were pushing ahead with the programme.
I would be very intersted to know if there has been a problem and what it
is. Could you E-mail me off list if you have any other information on
political or organisational difficulties you are aware of which has resulted
in this desiscion. I am trying to get a county wide 12 lead programme up and
running in Sussex. If there are lessons to be learnt I would like to learn
them now rather than after months of hard work setting it all up.
[log in to unmask]
Mike Bjarkoy
Paramedic
Sussex
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
[log in to unmask]
Sent: 16 July 2000 22:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Pre-hospital ECGs
In a message dated 16/07/00 21:06:42 GMT Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:
> I agree with you that A&E is the correct place to administer
thrombolysis -
> I never said anything to the contrary. The original question was asking
if
> there was benefit in prehospital 12 lead ECGs (yes there is) not where
> should thrombolysis be administered.
if so, why have Warwickshire Ambulance Service stopped doing prehospital 12
lead ECGs??
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|