JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  June 2000

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM June 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

racism

From:

"James M. Blaut" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

James M. Blaut

Date:

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:19:12 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (193 lines)




From:   James M. Blaut, 
To:     Critical geography lforum, INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
        Socialist Geograaphy Lis, INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
        
Date:   6/9/100  9:21 PM

RE:     racism 


From: "David Melville", INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
Date: 6/9/100,  8:40 PM
Re:   DEBATE: "Race...Ever?"...HR Watch report on drug convictions
disparity
 
 Race report singles out Illinois for drug-conviction disparity 
By Christi Parsons 
Tribune Staff Writer 
June 8, 2000 
 
Black men end up in Illinois prisons on drug convictions at a rate 57 times
greater than white men, the most striking gap of any state examined by a
new study of racial disparity in the nationwide war on drugs. 
 
As a result, 90 percent of drug offenders admitted to state prisons in
Illinois are African-American, the highest percentage in the country,
according to the report released Wednesday by Human Rights Watch, a New
York-based organization that monitors human rights worldwide. 
 
The study, which analyzed data reported to the U.S. Department of Justice
by 37 states, showed that black men across the nation are far more likely
to go to prison for drug crimes than are white menłeven though blacks are
estimated to account for less than 13 percent of the nationwide population
and government figures indicate that most drug users are white. 
 
"Five times as many whites use drugs as blacks," said Jamie Fellner, a
staff lawyer who wrote the report for the group, a New York-based
organization that monitors human rights worldwide. "But blacks comprise the
great majority of drug offenders sent to prison. Race is clearly a factor
in the process." 
 
The new figures could add fuel to debate about the role that racial
profiling plays in police work and prosecution. And though the notion that
race influences how law enforcement officials do their jobs is nothing new,
advocates hope the mounting statistical evidence will produce change. 
 
The new report, which Human Rights Watch said was the first state-by-state
analysis of its kind, tracks with other recent studies showing a
quantifiable link between race and admission to prison. One study released
earlier this year by the National Council on Crime and Delinquency found
that, when charged with the same offenses, black youths were much more
likely to be locked up than were white youths with comparable criminal
backgrounds. 
 
Human Rights Watch researchers say that a host of factors are responsible
for the disparity, including a heavier concentration of police sting
operations in minority neighborhoods and a greater likelihood that black
youths will be prosecuted once they are caught. 
 
Law enforcement officials say that they don't purposely target minorities
for arrest and prosecution and that they are working to come up with
alternatives to incarceration that can help drug offenders of all racial
backgrounds go straight. 
 
But critics of the criminal justice system say the latest statistics are
evidence that more sweeping reform is needed. 
 
In the study, researchers for Human Rights Watch analyzed demographic and
conviction information about hundreds of thousands of inmates admitted to
state prisons all over the country in 1996, the most recent year for which
complete data was available when the study began. A total of 37 states
voluntarily provided the information to the Justice Department that year. 
 
Overall, the study found that all 37 states incarcerated blacks at much
higher rates than whites. Weighting numbers to account for the smaller size
of the nationwide black population, the study concluded that in the 37
states black men are sent to state prison for drug convictions at a rate 13
times that of white men. 
 
In New York, black men were sent to prison for drug convictions at a rate
11 times greater than whites. In Maryland, they found the incarceration
rate 28 times greater for black men. In Minnesota, the rate for black men
was 39 times greater. 
 
Nationwide, blacks make up 62 percent of drug offenders admitted to state
prisons, according to the report. In seven of the states, blacks
constituted between 80 and 90 percent of all people sent to prison for drug
convictions. 
 
Those figures were even starker in Illinois, especially when researchers
considered the rate of prison admissions relative to overall population.
Out of every 100,000 white male adult residents of the state, 20 were sent
to prison during the study period for violation of drug laws. 
 
Meanwhile, of the same number of black adult males, 1,146 were admitted to
prison for the same reasonsła rate 57 times greater. 
 
Of the total number of people sent to Illinois prisons for drug convictions
that year, 90 percent were African-American, the study found. While blacks
make up only 15 percent of the state's population, they constitute 65
percent of the prison population as a whole. Whites make up 25 percent of
Illinois inmates, and Hispanics account for 10 percent. 
 
The researchers said they don't know specifically why Illinois'
incarceration rate for black men was so high, or why there was such a range
among the states. Among the 10 states with the greatest disparities, the
rate at which black men ended up in prison for drug crimes ranged from 27
to 57 times the rate for white men. 
 
But some lawyers and advocates argue that police and prosecutors treat
blacks differently than they treat whites. For starters, blacksłand black
men in particularłare stopped by police more often, said William Hooks,
president of the Cook County Bar Association, a group of African-American
lawyers and judges. 
 
If blacks are searched more often, they will be arrested more often, he
said. 
 
Young and first-time offenders are treated differently once they're in
police custody, too, said Hooks, who is also a Chicago criminal defense
attorney. Police tend to call a young white man's parents and try more
frequently to quickly end a case, he said. 
 
"When I go to court with my white clients in Cook County, oftentimes I am
met by the arresting officer and pulled aside," Hooks said. "The attitude
is, 'How can we resolve this? We don't want to hurt her."' 
 
Hooks said he tries to help that client be diverted from the court system
and into a counseling program because it's in her best interests. 
 
"But it hurts deep inside that my other clients don't get the same offer,"
he said. His black clients are often eligible for the same treatment, he
said, "but it's not this aggressive approach to get them out of the
system." 
 
Once those marks show up on a youth's record, said researcher Fellner,
there's a systemic bias against him. 
 
"Black kids are going to have more arrests on their records," she said.
"Each time you go through the turnstile, you are treated more harshly." 
 
But many law enforcement officials dispute claims that "racial profiling"
by police or prosecutors is the reason why more African-Americans are in
prison for drug convictions. 
 
"I've asked this question of other officers, of corrections officers," said
Bob Wallace, training director and public information officer for the
National Association of Chiefs of Police. "Probably the accurate answer is
because the majority of people who commit these crimes are of the
African-American culture." 
 
Wallace said he believes that some police officers unintentionally allow
personal observations about race to influence how they do their jobs. But
he said that doesn't fully explain the demographics of the prison
population. 
 
"In the high-crime areas, you do have a high population of African-American
people," Wallace said. "There are a lot of good people of all races.
Unfortunately, where you have poor standards of living, you're going to
find people looking for quick ways of making money." 
 
Prosecutors deny that decisions on whether to pursue cases are influenced
by race. Many prosecutors are now formalizing so-called diversion programs
in an attempt to help more young and first-time offenders of all races
avoid prison. 
 
In Cook County, half of all first- and second-time drug arrestees get drug
treatment instead of prosecution, said Bob Benjamin, spokesman for State's
Atty. Dick Devine. 
 
"You're trying to get them before they go too far on the escalator, with
more and more drug use, more and more misery," he said. 
 
As for whether a suspect's skin color makes any difference in determining
whether to proceed with prosecution, Benjamin said, "Race is not a factor
at all. Ever." 
 
Advocates for Human Rights Watch say they hope law enforcement agencies
around the country will adopt such diversion programs. 
 
"The solution to this racial inequity is not to incarcerate more whites,"
Fellner said, "but to reduce the use of prison for low-level drug offenders
and to increase the availability of substance abuse treatment."
 
Article received on Thursday, June 08 2000 at 07:02 EDT
 
F


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager