JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  June 2000

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM June 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: Mapping Lebanon Becomes Political

From:

"Kennison, Becky" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Kennison, Becky

Date:

Mon, 5 Jun 2000 08:44:23 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

Thought some of you might find this an interesting intersection of politics
and geography . . .

Becky

-----Original Message-----
Subject:	Mapping Lebanon Becomes Political

Mapping Lebanon Becomes Political
.c The Associated Press
By LAURA KING

METULLA, Israel (AP) - Sweat dripping from the end of his nose as he labored
under a blazing midday sun, Moshe Bar craned his neck and squinted, trying
to sight a straight line along the new fence he was helping to build between
Israel and Lebanon.
"Good fences, good neighbors," he shouted over the din of a portable
generator, sounding more like New England poet Robert Frost than a
rough-hewn Israeli building contractor.
In the Middle East, though, neighbors have never found it a simple matter to
draw a dividing line between them.
Since the last Israeli troops and tanks rolled out of southern Lebanon on
May 24, defining the new frontier between the two countries has become an
exercise not only in geography, but geopolitics.
Using yellowed maps and satellite technology, U.N. cartographers have been
redefining the colonial-era frontier that meanders from the Mediterranean
coast to the foothills of the Golan Heights, slicing its way through stony
hills, bisecting backyards, halving orchards, even dividing a village.
U.N. verification of Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon, expected within a
matter of days, hinges on agreement that the Israelis have fallen back to
the internationally recognized border - drawn in 1923 by Britain, which
administered then-Palestine, and France, which had dominion over what are
now Syria and Lebanon.
As the modern-day mapmakers have gone about their task, defining the 50-mile
frontier with splashes of paint and stone markers, conflicting claims have
bubbled to the surface.
Geographers say some ambiguities stem from the simple fact that human beings
leave their mark on the landscape - they build roads, change the direction
of watersheds, fill in riverbeds, plow away hilltops, eradicate landmarks.
"It becomes a question of translating the map of then to the reality of
today - a physical reality that in some areas has changed," said Amnon
Kartin, a professor of geography at Tel Aviv University.
Such questions involve mainly small parcels of land. But bigger regional
disputes also have come into play.
Syria, which effectively runs Lebanon, has been a dominant force in
discussions about the border. The Syrians initially demanded that the United
Nations not verify Israel's withdrawal unless it ceded to Lebanon a strip of
land in the foothills of the Golan Heights known as the Chebaa farms.
Israel, backed by the United Nations, says the territory is irrelevant to
its border with Lebanon, because it was won from Syria in the 1967 Middle
East war.
This week, pressed by a U.N. envoy, Syria grudgingly agreed to accept the
U.N. position - but the Damascus government made clear it would continue to
seek sovereignty over Chebaa either for itself or Lebanon.
Also unresolved is the fate of the Israeli border village of Ghajar. Its
1,800 people, who are mainly Alawites, a fringe Muslim sect, were dismayed
to learn that according to the 1923 border, part of their community
apparently lies in Lebanon.
"It doesn't make sense, my sister in one country and I in another," said
Adel Shimali, a 41-year-old Ghajar resident, who showed the family's
crumbling and creased original land deeds, dating to Ottoman times.
In recent days, tensions have also surfaced between Lebanon and the United
Nations over the demarcation. Lebanon's state-run National News Agency
reported a charged atmosphere in closed-door talks this week between
Lebanese officials and U.N. cartographers, with the Lebanese raising
accusations of pro-Israel bias on the United Nations' part.
Israel's army is still grappling with the problem of how to defend the new
border. After its incursions into Lebanon in 1978 and 1982, Israel altered
the border based on military considerations.
When Israeli troops occupied southern Lebanon, they could seize strategic
hilltops as they pleased. With the new demarcation line, though, the army
finds itself occupying low ground at some points along the border.
Heavy Israeli troop reinforcements are in place, although mainly staying out
of sight to avoid inflaming tensions. At the Israeli border community of
Mishgav Am, a lone 20-year-old soldier named Amir patrolled the frontier
fence.
"Yes, I'm all alone, but if anything happens, my friends will be here in a
minute," he said, waving his hand-held radio.
The new fence - nearly finished in some areas, still under construction in
others - will have an array of high-tech defenses, including motion sensors.
That's not enough to satisfy some residents, who pressed for Israel to keep
a narrow buffer zone of a few hundred yards after the withdrawal rather than
reverting to the international border.
"We are very, very vulnerable to infiltration attacks," said Ron Hazan, a
former security chief for the northern communities' regional council.
Israeli leaders, though, said keeping even a small slice of Lebanese
territory would have scuttled any chances for U.N. verification of the
withdrawal.
In the days immediately following Israel's pullout, there was a free-for-all
on both sides of the frontier, with people from either side - some armed,
many angry - able to walk right up to the border fence.
After a few flare-ups of violence, both sides - Israeli troops on the one
side, Hezbollah guerrillas and Lebanese police on the other - are now
restricting movement along the frontier.
That may bring an end to the daily reunions of Palestinians in Israel with
relatives in Lebanon. Separated by a pair of fences and a narrow strip of no
man's land, relatives who have not seen one another for years toss fruit and
flowers back and forth and exchange shouted greetings.
"I'm so happy," said Omar Khassem, who lives in Israel. On the other side of
the fence, pressing against the barbed wire, were his uncle and aunt, who
live in a refugee camp in Lebanon. Both were crying.
"I can't touch them," said Khassem, holding up his small son, Said, for his
relatives to see. "But I can hold them in my heart."
AP-NY-06-02-00 1511EDT
Copyright 2000 The Associated Press. 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager