On Fri, 12 May 2000 11:03:43 +0100 "Mike PRESS(SCS)"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I felt that Beryl Graham was very clear in defining her
> challenge, but David Durling's recent contribution would appear
> (apologies David if I misunderstand) to frame the challenge in
> terms that Beryl and others, myself included, are keen to avoid.
>
Perhaps I should have been clearer that I was responding to
Beryl's post of 22 March when she invited folks to tell her about
"which practice-led doctoral theses they have read (fine art in
particular, but design might do). Just so we know the primary
sources of our discussion."
As the general discussion was around doctoral standards, it seems
that one might have to mention examples of both poor and good.
As I said, there are some contraints on one, not on the other.
David
: ..............
: Dr. David Durling, :
: Director, Advanced Research Institute :
: School of Art & Design, Staffordshire University :
: Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DE, UK :
: vox:+44 (0)1782 294556 (direct) fax:+44 (0)1782 294873 :
: <[log in to unmask]> :
.............. :
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|