JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DRS Archives


DRS Archives

DRS Archives


DRS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DRS Home

DRS Home

DRS  May 2000

DRS May 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Social Science Research and Industrial Design

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 3 May 2000 00:07:51 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (100 lines)

In a message dated 05/01/2000 5:20:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< See this post is offlist. Would like to see it onlist with your own
 observations on why larger clients value this kind of sound research-based
 project development. >>

<<Also -- it occurs to me that I didn't address the issue of firms so large
that they know they can't afford NOT to invest wisely in a rich design
process. In that, firms in the US and Japan may be more advanced than the
much smaller firms of Scandinavia and Europe, as well as American SMEs.
Their budgets force them to cut corners.>>

Sorry I have taken some time to reply but I have not have much spare time 
recently.

The environment for Industrial Design in California is unique.

The pressures to get new technology products to market is greater than it has 
been anywhere anytime in the past.

The result of several decades of relatively successful design development for 
computer and consumer products following on from a locally based aeronautical 
industry in previous decades following from a boom in oil production and a 
strong film industry following a gold rush last century has left California 
in a unique position. Companies from Microsoft to Netscape to Fox are 
developing much of the world's intellectual property in Software, Hardware 
and entertainment within a radius of a few hundred Kilometers of where I am 
writing this email. A number of US car companies recently announced that they 
are moving their Research here from Detroit.

 Early this century California provided 25% of the world's oil. Today it 
provides most of the world's intellectual property in software, hardware, 
entertainment and military technology. San Francisco is developing rapidly as 
a center of Internet companies. It has become a technology Gold Rush. And 
people from all over the world are pouring into the area in order to become 
part of the success. A recent study showed that there were only 4 houses 
available for sale in the area where I work, a region of 1.6 million 
population. A good industrial designer here can demand ten times the salary 
of such a person in Australia where I was previously working after a number 
of years in Europe.

There is more optimism and ability to produce successful products here than 
almost anywhere else in the world. People enjoy the process.

Companies still spend what is necessary to get products to market as fast as 
possible but they have learnt that involvement with social scientists helps 
products be successful. It helps companies understand what people want, what 
they need and how people behave. Most industrial designers are not as good at 
predicting and researching these things as social scientists. The benefits of 
involvement by anthropologists are obvious and probably easier to sell to a 
client than the benefits of industrial design.

 I think Californian companies also have an aggressive attitude to getting 
things done which may be related to the history of the West where failure 
could be unforgiving.

Many US companies have good budgets relative to other places and understand 
the value of such research.

For anthropologists there is a new methodology developing which allows them 
to become part of the development process. They are also more aware of the 
greater picture of society than industrial designers. They are more aware of 
human psychology and the ancient origins of and reasons for human behavior.

Designers are becoming more interested in these areas. I got an email from a 
graduate Spanish industrial designer today which I will briefly quote 
something:

> i know Stefan told you about me, I'm so so so glad. we were talking about
> strategy and sociology and anthropology and life and evolution and lots of
> lots... I'm really interested in design as something deeply related with
> the human being and culture evolution, and that's what I'm excited about.
> Stefan told me a little about your background and i would more than like
> to share some emotions and thoughts with you, 'cos i feel i have something
> to do/share/say to/with this world, i just want to know which is the best
> way to do it... maybe you can help me, maybe you have some clues.

I am not sure I do have enough clues.

I think part of frog's strength is that they have a unique blend of cultural 
input in their design which no longer just reflects their European origins.

Industrial design is appearing everywhere here. In women's magazines, in 
business magazines, on television, in fine art circles, on billboards. It is 
developing a level of maturity which it has not had before and everyone is 
taking notice. From company directors. (60% of American VPs know of frog)  to 
ordinary people arguing about the design of the iMac, a new awareness is 
appearing. It is an exciting time and place to be working

Rob Curedale
Senior Producer
frogdesign Silicon Valley

Rob [log in to unmask]
Cell:1818 292 0599


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
October 2019
August 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
September 2018
July 2018
May 2018
November 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
February 2014
December 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
November 2012
October 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager