Figured this was meant for the list :)
-----
Original message from: "Simon Stevens" <[log in to unmask]>
>
>The can of worms is open, impairment is free at last! The only
problem is nobody has the same idea of what the terms disability
>and impairment means or how they relate. For too long the UK and US
divide in terms of social model rights vs consumer freedom, has left
this list in confusion at times.
>
>For myself, there is my definition, just to make things worst.
>
>Disability is a social, physical, psychological, emotional,
attitudinal, institutional (and so on) barrier which is external to an
impaired person and not in their control. Disability can differ
according to the situation and is a measure of the self-determined
difficulties an impaired people has in accessing their environment in
their desired way and lifestyle, in all its forms. In theory,
disability can be removed from society. Also, while disability is
connected to impaired people, it could also be relevant to other
groups, such as women, in terms of meeting lifestyle requirements in
the mainstream, such as child care.
>
>Impairment is a biological difference in function or appearance which
may require different or unique lifestyle elements (such as diet) from
the perceived norm. Impairment has a neutral value. Impairment can
also be seen as a part of a person's identity, culture and way of
living. It is personally experienced and while giving raise to the
need for impairment specific peer support, can not be compared easier
with others. Impairment is also a part of normal life and should not
removed. (not sure if this is clear)
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Simon
__________________________________________________________________
Get your free Australian email account at http://www.start.com.au
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|