Would you be so kind to identify yourself.
Thank you.
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> The following abstract (at http://www.socesp.org.br/revista/v8n2/687a.htm)
> offers some research findings that suggest the descending arm of the Starling
> Curve is not due to an overlengthening of the sarcomeres "since sarcomere is
> not lengthened farther than the optimum length" , but rather due to
> "afterload mismatch". There is also discussion on stretch modifying calcium
> kinetics. As an elaboration on the work of Starling it appears to show that
> there is more to the stretch/power relatioship than initially thought. Also
> the optimum length stated in the abstract is not elaborated on.
>
> Could anyone with a full report of this paper provide some further insight.
> Thanks.
--
Douglas M. White, PT, OCS
Physical Therapist, Consultant
191 Blue Hills Parkway
Milton, MA USA 02186
P: 617.696.1974
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|