As someone else pointed out there is more than one "social
model" floating around. And my question is: How can anyone
think a model is thought of, can be defined as, is "truth"
(as if that actually has one interpretation for all)? It's
an academic exercise to, quite bluntly, keep academics
busy. Models don't solve anything. They are based upon
past events (history) and are pretty much subjective. Like
the political process model (McAdam), the participation
model (Piven and Cloward), or any one of a billion other
models, it is simply a descriptive of what the academic sees
happening within a particular environment or event.
--
Carolyn
In the land of the Blind, the one eyed man is . . . a freak.
check out, "Passing, Invisibility and Other Psychotic Stuff"
at
http://www.tell-us-your-story.com/_disc68r/00000003.htm
Add your story
at http://www.tell-us-your-story.com
Finding What We Have In Common One Story At A Time*
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|